Friction Marks of Stabbing Tools in Tires. Issue 5 (23rd April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Finkelstein, Nir S.; Silchenko, Alexander; Cohen, Yaron
• Is Part Of: Journal of forensic sciences. Volume 65:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 1736
• Page End: 1744
• Publication Date: 2020-04-23
• Subjects: forensic science -- toolmarks -- stabbing tool -- tire stabbing -- shank shape -- friction mark -- screwdriver -- knife -- criminalistics -- puncture; Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals; Forensic sciences -- Periodicals; Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals; Gerechtelijke geneeskunde; Gerechtelijke chemie; Gerechtelijke psychiatrie; 363.2505
• DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14325
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-1198

Abstract

Abstract: When receiving a stabbed tire for examination, forensic toolmark examiners can determine whether a suspect tool was used in a specific crime based on class‐characteristics and individual‐characteristics marks that have been left by the tool on the tire. This study discusses friction marks and their forensic value during the examination of a punctured tire. The term friction mark refers to the noticeable mark around the penetration area on a tire's surface. Tires designed to create high friction when contacting a road. Due to this design, friction is created between the stabbing tool shank and the sides of the hole. As a result of this friction, the shank of the stabbing tool wears the outer layer of tire around the hole. This leaves a friction mark whose general shape reflects the cross‐sectional shape of the stabbing tool's shank. This phenomenon was observed and named by Locke (7) in his evaluation of tire puncture marks with knives. This article demonstrates the same phenomenon with other types of stabbing tools. Test stabs were produced with different tools representing a variety of cross‐sectional shapes of shanks, and the resulting friction marks were photo‐documented and discussed. Correlations between the various cross‐sectional shapes and their corresponding friction marks are shown. Based on friction mark examination, the examiner: (i) can infer suspect tool shank cross‐sectional shape with the evaluation of the friction mark shape and (ii) can deduce the maximum dimensions of the shank. This examination simplifies and accelerates the forensic comparison procedure and the investigation time.