A COMMENT ON "ESTIMATING DYNAMIC DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS WITH HYPERBOLIC DISCOUNTING" BY HANMING FANG AND YANG WANG. (28th April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abbring, Jaap H.; Daljord, Øystein
• Is Part Of: International economic review. Volume 61:Number 2(2020)
• Page Start: 565
• Page End: 571
• Publication Date: 2020-04-28
• Subjects: Economics -- Periodicals; 330.05
• DOI: 10.1111/iere.12434
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-6598

Abstract

Abstract: Fang and Wang's (2015) Proposition 2 claims generic identification of a dynamic discrete choice model with hyperbolic discounting under exclusion restrictions. We note that Proposition 2 uses a definition of "generic" that does not preclude that a generically identified model is nowhere identified. We provide two examples of models that are generically identified under this definition, but that are, respectively, everywhere and nowhere identified. We then show that the proof of Proposition 2 is incorrect and incomplete. We conclude that Proposition 2 has no implications for identification of the dynamic discrete choice model and suggest alternative approaches to its identification.