O-P06 Early postoperative differentiation between biochemical leak and clinically-relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a predictive risk score. (16th December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- O-P06 Early postoperative differentiation between biochemical leak and clinically-relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a predictive risk score. (16th December 2021)
- Main Title:
- O-P06 Early postoperative differentiation between biochemical leak and clinically-relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a predictive risk score
- Authors:
- Raza, Syed Soulat
Nutu, Anisa
Powell-Brett, Sarah
Boteon, Amanda Carvalheiro
Hodson, James
Chatzizacharias, Nikolaos
Dasari, Bobby
Isaac, John
Abradelo, Mauel
Marudanayagam, Ravi
Mirza, Darius
Roberts, Keith
Sutcliffe, Robert - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Several risk scores are available which predict pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but do not differentiate between biochemical leak (BL) and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). The aim of this study was to identify factors that differentiate between BL and CR-POPF in the early postoperative period. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with BL and CR-POPF after PD were identified from a prospectively maintained database (2009-2019). Data were collected for demographics, intraoperative and laboratory parameters on the first five postoperative days (PODs), including drain fluid amylase (DFA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin. Independent predictors of CR-POPF were identified using a multivariable binary logistic regression model, which was subsequently converted to a risk score Results: 187 patients consisted of 99 BL and 88 CR-POPF. In those with CR-POPF, the leak became clinically relevant a median of 9 days after surgery; these patients had a significantly higher length of hospital stay than those with BL (median: 24 vs. 10 days, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, male gender (p = 0.002), higher DFA (p < 0.001) or CRP (p < 0.001) on POD3, lower albumin (p = 0.028) on POD3 were all found to be independent predictors of CR-POPF. A risk score based on these factors returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.78. Conclusions: In patients with a confirmed pancreatic fistula it may be possible to differentiateAbstract: Background: Several risk scores are available which predict pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but do not differentiate between biochemical leak (BL) and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). The aim of this study was to identify factors that differentiate between BL and CR-POPF in the early postoperative period. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with BL and CR-POPF after PD were identified from a prospectively maintained database (2009-2019). Data were collected for demographics, intraoperative and laboratory parameters on the first five postoperative days (PODs), including drain fluid amylase (DFA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin. Independent predictors of CR-POPF were identified using a multivariable binary logistic regression model, which was subsequently converted to a risk score Results: 187 patients consisted of 99 BL and 88 CR-POPF. In those with CR-POPF, the leak became clinically relevant a median of 9 days after surgery; these patients had a significantly higher length of hospital stay than those with BL (median: 24 vs. 10 days, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, male gender (p = 0.002), higher DFA (p < 0.001) or CRP (p < 0.001) on POD3, lower albumin (p = 0.028) on POD3 were all found to be independent predictors of CR-POPF. A risk score based on these factors returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.78. Conclusions: In patients with a confirmed pancreatic fistula it may be possible to differentiate between BL and CR-POPF using early postoperative variables, particularly DFA, serum albumin and CRP. Early identification of CR-POPF may allow earlier intervention to improve clinical outcomes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 108:Supplement 9(2021)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 108:Supplement 9(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 108, Issue 9 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 108
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0108-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12-16
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bjs/znab429.047 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20514.xml