Associations Between Perceived Physical and Mental Fatigability and Life Space Mobility in Older Men: The MrOS Study. (17th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rosso, Andrea; Gmelin, Theresa; Qiao, Yujia (Susanna); Carlson, Michelle; Cawthon, Peggy; Cauley, Jane; Glynn, Nancy W; Moored, Kyle
• Is Part Of: Innovation in aging. Volume 5(2021)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 565
• Page End: 565
• Publication Date: 2021-12-17
• Subjects: Aging -- Periodicals; Gerontology -- Periodicals; 612.67
• DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igab046.2156
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2399-5300

Abstract

Abstract: Physical performance and fatigue can limit mobility within the larger environment (life-space mobility). It is unknown whether perceived fatigability, fatigue anchored to activity intensity and duration, is independently associated with life-space. We assessed this cross-sectionally in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS; N=1, 681, Meanage=85±4.1). The Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS, range: 0-50) measured physical (Mean=16.2±9.5) and mental fatigability (Mean=7.5±8.0). Life Space Assessment scores (range: 0-120, higher=greater life-space) incorporated level, frequency, and assistance used for life-space mobility (Mean=84.3±22.0). Compared to the lowest fatigability strata (Physical: PFS 0-4; Mental: PFS 0-3, modeled separately), men in the two highest physical strata (PFS 20-24: B=-4.10±1.67; PFS≥25: B=-6.23±1.72; p's≤.05) and men in the three highest mental strata reported significantly lower life-space mobility (PFS 13-15: B=-3.42±1.74; PFS 16-19: B=-5.38±1.83; PFS≥20: B=-7.96±1.66, p's≤.05), adjusted for physical performance and health covariates. Our results provide evidence linking fatigability and real-world mobility, independent of physical health, in older men.