Implementation of guideline recommendations and outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Data from the IPF-PRO registry. (November 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Implementation of guideline recommendations and outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Data from the IPF-PRO registry. (November 2021)
- Main Title:
- Implementation of guideline recommendations and outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Data from the IPF-PRO registry
- Authors:
- de Andrade, Joao A.
Kulkarni, Tejaswini
Neely, Megan L.
Hellkamp, Anne S.
Case, Amy Hajari
Guntupalli, Kalpalatha
Bender, Shaun
Conoscenti, Craig S.
Snyder, Laurie D. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Few data are available on the extent to which clinical practice is aligned with international guidelines for the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We investigated the extent to which management guidelines for IPF have been implemented in the US IPF-PRO Registry and associations between implementation of guidelines and clinical outcomes. Methods: We assessed the implementation of eight recommendations in clinical practice guidelines within the 6 months after enrollment: visit to a specialized clinic; pulmonary function testing; use of oxygen in patients with resting hypoxemia and exercise-induced hypoxemia; referral for pulmonary rehabilitation; treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease; initiation of anti-fibrotic therapy; referral for lung transplant evaluation. An implementation score was calculated as the number of recommendations achieved divided by the number for which the patient was eligible. Associations between implementation score and outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 727 patients, median (Q1, Q3) implementation score was 0.6 (0.5, 0.8). Patients with an implementation score >0.6 had greater disease severity than those with a lower score. Implementation was lowest for referral for pulmonary rehabilitation (19.5%) and lung transplant evaluation (22.3%). In unadjusted models, patients with higher implementation scores had a greater risk of death, death orAbstract: Background: Few data are available on the extent to which clinical practice is aligned with international guidelines for the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We investigated the extent to which management guidelines for IPF have been implemented in the US IPF-PRO Registry and associations between implementation of guidelines and clinical outcomes. Methods: We assessed the implementation of eight recommendations in clinical practice guidelines within the 6 months after enrollment: visit to a specialized clinic; pulmonary function testing; use of oxygen in patients with resting hypoxemia and exercise-induced hypoxemia; referral for pulmonary rehabilitation; treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease; initiation of anti-fibrotic therapy; referral for lung transplant evaluation. An implementation score was calculated as the number of recommendations achieved divided by the number for which the patient was eligible. Associations between implementation score and outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 727 patients, median (Q1, Q3) implementation score was 0.6 (0.5, 0.8). Patients with an implementation score >0.6 had greater disease severity than those with a lower score. Implementation was lowest for referral for pulmonary rehabilitation (19.5%) and lung transplant evaluation (22.3%). In unadjusted models, patients with higher implementation scores had a greater risk of death, death or lung transplant, and hospitalization, but no significant associations were observed in adjusted models. Conclusions: Management guidelines were more likely to be implemented in patients with IPF with greater disease severity. When adjusted for disease severity, no association was found between implementation of management guidelines and clinical outcomes. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: We investigated the implementation of guidelines for the management of IPF. Guidelines were more likely to be implemented in patients with more severe disease. In adjusted models, there were no associations between guideline use and outcomes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Respiratory medicine. Volume 189(2021)
- Journal:
- Respiratory medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 189(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 189, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 189
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0189-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-11
- Subjects:
- Lung disease -- Interstitial pulmonary fibrosis -- Guideline -- Hospitalization -- Mortality
ALAT Latin American Thoracic Association -- ATS American Thoracic Society -- BMI Body mass index -- CASA-Q Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire -- DLco Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide -- EQ-5D EuroQoL 5-D -- ERS European Respiratory Society -- FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in 1 s -- FVC Forced vital capacity -- GERD Gastroesophageal reflux disease -- IPF Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis -- JRS Japanese Respiratory Society -- MCS Mental component summary -- PCS Physical component summary -- SGRQ St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire -- SF-12 Short Form-12 -- VAS Visual analog scale
Chest -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Chest -- Diseases -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiratory Tract Diseases -- Periodicals
Appareil respiratoire -- Maladies -- Périodiques
Thorax -- Maladies -- Périodiques
Appareil respiratoire -- Maladies -- Traitement -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09546111 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09546111 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09546111 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106637 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0954-6111
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7777.661900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20465.xml