Sunscreens With High Versus Low Sun Protection Factor and Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Risk: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Issue 1 (11th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lergenmuller, Simon; Ghiasvand, Reza; Robsahm, Trude E; Green, Adele C; Lund, Eiliv; Rueegg, Corina S; Veierød, Marit B
• Is Part Of: American journal of epidemiology. Volume 191:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 75
• Page End: 84
• Publication Date: 2021-08-11
• Subjects: cohort study -- cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma -- inverse probability weighting -- marginal structural model -- sun protection factor -- sunscreen -- ultraviolet exposure; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab216
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-9262

Abstract

Abstract: Evidence on sunscreen use and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) risk is limited. Most studies have not taken sun protection factor (SPF) into consideration and used nonusers of sunscreen as the reference group. Nonusers are likely a priori at lower cSCC risk than users. No study has investigated the effect of high- versus low-SPF sunscreens on cSCC, appropriately adjusting for time-varying confounding. Using data from the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (1991–2016), we investigated whether use of SPF ≥15 versus SPF <15 sunscreens reduces cSCC risk. We used a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). During follow-up of 148, 781 women (mean follow-up, 14.3 years), 653 women were diagnosed with cSCC. The effect on cSCC risk of sunscreens with SPF ≥15 versus SPF <15 was close to the null when used at any latitudes (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.27) and when used in lower-latitude settings (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.84, 1.32). In conclusion, we found no indication that sunscreens with SPF ≥15 reduced Norwegian women's cSCC risk more than sunscreens with SPF <15, suggesting that either there is no difference in their effects long-term or the difference is diluted by incorrect application.