Simplified risk-prediction for benchmarking and quality improvement in emergency general surgery. Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study. (January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Simplified risk-prediction for benchmarking and quality improvement in emergency general surgery. Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study. (January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Simplified risk-prediction for benchmarking and quality improvement in emergency general surgery. Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study
- Authors:
- Villodre, C.
Taccogna, L.
Zapater, P.
Cantó, M.
Mena, L.
Ramia, J.M.
Lluís, F.
Afonso, N.
Aguilella, V.
Aguiló, J.
Alados, J.C.
Alberich, M.
Apio, A.B.
Balongo, R.
Bra, E.
Bravo-Gutiérrez, A.
Briceño, F.J.
Cabañas, J.
Cánovas, G.
Caravaca, I.
Carbonell, S.
Carrera-Dacosta, E.
Castro E, E.
Caula, C.
Choolani-Bhojwani, E.
Codina, A.
Corral, S.
Cuenca, C.
Curbelo-Peña, Y.
Delgado-Morales, M.M.
Delgado-Plasencia, L.
Doménech, E.
Estévez, A.M.
Feria, A.M.
Gascón-Domínguez, M.A.
Gianchandani, R.
González, C.
Hevia, R.J.
González, M.A.
Hidalgo, J.M.
Lainez, M.
Lluís, N.
López, F.
López-Fernández, J.
López-Ruíz, J.A.
Lora-Cumplido, P.
Madrazo, Z.
Marchena, J.
Marenco de la Cuadra, B.
Martín, S.
Casas, I. Martínez
Martínez, P.
Mena-Mateos, A.
Morales-García, D.
Mulas, C.
Muñoz-Forner, E.
Naranjo, A.
Navarro-Sánchez, A.
Oliver, I.
Ortega, I.
Ortega-Higueruelo, R.
Ortega-Ruiz, S.
Osorio, J.
Padín, M.H.
Pamies, J.J.
Paredes, M.
Pareja-Ciuró, F.
Parra, J.
Pérez-Guarinós, C.V.
Pérez-Saborido, B.
Pintor-Tortolero, J.
Plua-Muñiz, K.
Rey, M.
Rodríguez, I.
Ruiz, C.
Ruíz, R.
Ruiz, S.
Sánchez, A.
Sánchez, D.
Sánchez, R.
Sánchez-Cabezudo, F.
Sánchez-Santos, R.
Santos, J.
Serrano-Paz, M.P.
Soria-Aledo, V.
Tallón-Aguilar, L.
Valdivia-Risco, J.H.
Vallverdú-Cartié, H.
Varela, C.
Villar-del-Moral, J.
Zambudio, N.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background and aims: Emergency General Surgery (EGS) conditions account for millions of deaths worldwide, yet it is practiced without benchmarking-based quality improvement programs. The aim of this observational, prospective, multicenter, nationwide study was to determine the best benchmark cutoff points in EGS, as a reference to guide improvement measures. Methods: Over a 6-month period, 38 centers (5% of all public hospitals) attending EGS patients on a 24-h, 7-days a week basis, enrolled consecutive patients requiring an emergent/urgent surgical procedure. Patients were stratified into cohorts of low (i.e., expected morbidity risk <33%), middle and high risk using the novel m-LUCENTUM calculator. Results: A total of 7258 patients were included; age (mean ± SD) was 51.1 ± 21.5 years, 43.2% were female. Benchmark cutoffs in the low-risk cohort (5639 patients, 77.7% of total) were: use of laparoscopy ≥40.9%, length of hospital stays ≤3 days, any complication within 30 days ≤ 17.7%, and 30-day mortality ≤1.1%. The variables with the greatest impact were septicemia on length of hospital stay (21 days; adjusted beta coefficient 16.8; 95% CI: 15.3 to 18.3; P < .001), and respiratory failure on mortality (risk-adjusted population attributable fraction 44.6%, 95% CI 29.6 to 59.6, P < .001). Use of laparoscopy (odds ratio 0.764, 95% CI 0.678 to 0.861; P < .001), and intraoperative blood loss (101–500 mL: odds ratio 2.699, 95% CI 2.152 to 3.380; P < .001; andAbstract: Background and aims: Emergency General Surgery (EGS) conditions account for millions of deaths worldwide, yet it is practiced without benchmarking-based quality improvement programs. The aim of this observational, prospective, multicenter, nationwide study was to determine the best benchmark cutoff points in EGS, as a reference to guide improvement measures. Methods: Over a 6-month period, 38 centers (5% of all public hospitals) attending EGS patients on a 24-h, 7-days a week basis, enrolled consecutive patients requiring an emergent/urgent surgical procedure. Patients were stratified into cohorts of low (i.e., expected morbidity risk <33%), middle and high risk using the novel m-LUCENTUM calculator. Results: A total of 7258 patients were included; age (mean ± SD) was 51.1 ± 21.5 years, 43.2% were female. Benchmark cutoffs in the low-risk cohort (5639 patients, 77.7% of total) were: use of laparoscopy ≥40.9%, length of hospital stays ≤3 days, any complication within 30 days ≤ 17.7%, and 30-day mortality ≤1.1%. The variables with the greatest impact were septicemia on length of hospital stay (21 days; adjusted beta coefficient 16.8; 95% CI: 15.3 to 18.3; P < .001), and respiratory failure on mortality (risk-adjusted population attributable fraction 44.6%, 95% CI 29.6 to 59.6, P < .001). Use of laparoscopy (odds ratio 0.764, 95% CI 0.678 to 0.861; P < .001), and intraoperative blood loss (101–500 mL: odds ratio 2.699, 95% CI 2.152 to 3.380; P < .001; and 500–1000 mL: odds ratio 2.875, 95% CI 1.403 to 5.858; P = .013) were associated with increased morbidity. Conclusions: This study offers, for the first time, clinically-based benchmark values in EGS and identifies measures for improvement. Highlights: The best benchmark cut-offs in Emergency General Surgery are unknown. The present study established benchmark cut-off values in a low-risk cohort. Benchmark cut-off was ≥40.9% for use of laparoscopy, and ≤3 days for hospital stays. Benchmark cut-off was ≤17.7% for 30-day morbidity, and ≤1.1% for 30-day mortality. These cut-offs values may guide quality improvement in Emergency General Surgery. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of surgery. Volume 97(2022)
- Journal:
- International journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 97(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 97, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 97
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0097-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01
- Subjects:
- Risk-prediction -- Benchmarking -- Quality improvement -- Emergency general surgery
Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17439191 ↗
http://ees.elsevier.com/ijs/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106168 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1743-9191
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.685050
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20491.xml