Percutaneous biliary stone clearance: is there still a need? A 10-year single-centre experience. Issue 2 (February 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Percutaneous biliary stone clearance: is there still a need? A 10-year single-centre experience. Issue 2 (February 2022)
- Main Title:
- Percutaneous biliary stone clearance: is there still a need? A 10-year single-centre experience
- Authors:
- Kilic, Y.
Graham, A.
Tait, N.P.
Spalding, D.
Vlavianos, P.
Jiao, L.R.
Alsafi, A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous biliary stone clearance in a single hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent percutaneous biliary stone clearance between 2010 and 2020 at a HPB centre were identified from the radiology information system. Their demographic data, presentation, previous surgery, number/size of biliary calculi, success and complications were collected from patient records. Unpaired student's t -test was used to compare numerical variables and the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients aged between 58.5–91.1 years underwent the procedure, and 42.6% (29/68) had the procedure due to surgically altered anatomy precluding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The most common presentation was cholangitis (62%). The success rate of percutaneous stone clearance was 92.7%. The average number of calculi was two (range 1–12). Of the patients included, 4.4% developed pancreatitis, 4.4% developed cholangitis, and 1.5% had hepatic artery branch pseudoaneurysm successfully treated with transarterial embolisation. There was no significant difference in success or complication rates between the different access sites (right lobe, left lobe, roux-loop, T-tube, p= 0.7767). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous biliary stone clearance is safe and effective and will continue to play an important role where ERCP fails or is impossible due surgicallyAbstract : AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous biliary stone clearance in a single hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent percutaneous biliary stone clearance between 2010 and 2020 at a HPB centre were identified from the radiology information system. Their demographic data, presentation, previous surgery, number/size of biliary calculi, success and complications were collected from patient records. Unpaired student's t -test was used to compare numerical variables and the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients aged between 58.5–91.1 years underwent the procedure, and 42.6% (29/68) had the procedure due to surgically altered anatomy precluding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The most common presentation was cholangitis (62%). The success rate of percutaneous stone clearance was 92.7%. The average number of calculi was two (range 1–12). Of the patients included, 4.4% developed pancreatitis, 4.4% developed cholangitis, and 1.5% had hepatic artery branch pseudoaneurysm successfully treated with transarterial embolisation. There was no significant difference in success or complication rates between the different access sites (right lobe, left lobe, roux-loop, T-tube, p= 0.7767). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous biliary stone clearance is safe and effective and will continue to play an important role where ERCP fails or is impossible due surgically altered anatomy. Highlights: Biliary calculi can be effectively treated percutaneously when ERCP is not possible. The technique plays an important role in patients with surgically altered GI anatomy. Percutaneous cholangioscopy & lithotripsy may facilitate treatment of larger calculi. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical radiology. Volume 77:Issue 2(2022)
- Journal:
- Clinical radiology
- Issue:
- Volume 77:Issue 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 77, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 77
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0077-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 130
- Page End:
- 135
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02
- Subjects:
- Medical radiology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiology -- Periodicals
Societies, Medical -- Periodicals
Medical radiology
Radiotherapy
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.0757 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00099260 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.crad.2021.10.015 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9260
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.350000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20507.xml