Fast Discrimination of Marijuana using Automated High‐throughput Cannabis Sample Preparation and Analysis by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. Issue 5 (3rd August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Horne, Melissa; Mastrianni, Kaylee R.; Amick, Gray; Hardy, Rachel; Renneker, Elissa; Miller, Kevin W.P.
• Is Part Of: Journal of forensic sciences. Volume 65:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 1709
• Page End: 1715
• Publication Date: 2020-08-03
• Subjects: drug identification -- cannabis -- tetrahydrocannabinol -- cannabidiol -- marijuana -- hemp -- gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals; Forensic sciences -- Periodicals; Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals; Gerechtelijke geneeskunde; Gerechtelijke chemie; Gerechtelijke psychiatrie; 363.2505
• DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14525
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-1198

Abstract

Abstract: In the United States, federal law and many state laws differentiate between marijuana and industrial hemp through delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) levels, whereby the latter is defined as ≤0.3 percent THC on a dry weight basis. Many traditional cannabis identification methods employed by crime laboratories cannot accurately determine total THC quantities in accordance with federal and state regulations, or do so with increased time, labor, and risks of instrument damage. In order to quickly distinguish positive marijuana samples, a method was developed to identify plant material with a total THC level >1%. This novel, automated dispersive pipette extraction (DPX) method uses tip‐based technology and an automated liquid handler to enable fast, hands‐free selective isolation of THC and its precursors for downstream gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) analysis. The workflow proceeds with no repetitive manual effort and reduced need for instrument maintenance while enabling crime labs to legally identify marijuana through the detection of total THC above 1%. Recovery of THC using the DPX extraction method was 93% at 30 µg/mL and 78% at 500 µg/mL. Similarly, THCA‐A recovery was 100% at 30 µg/mL and 74% at 500 µg/mL. Samples evaluated in a blind study (proficiency, hemp, and nonprobative case samples) were all accurately identified as greater than or less than 1% THC, with samples containing <1% THC being identified as "cannabis" and subjected to more discriminative analysis as needed.