A global evaluation of multi‐model ensemble tropical cyclone track probability forecasts. (1st January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A global evaluation of multi‐model ensemble tropical cyclone track probability forecasts. (1st January 2020)
- Main Title:
- A global evaluation of multi‐model ensemble tropical cyclone track probability forecasts
- Authors:
- Titley, Helen A.
Bowyer, Rebecca L.
Cloke, Hannah L. - Abstract:
- Abstract: At the Met Office, dynamic ensemble forecasts from the Met Office Global and Regional Ensemble Prediction System (MOGREPS‐G), the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Ensemble (ECMWF ENS) and National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Ensemble Forecast System (NCEP GEFS) global ensemble forecast models are post‐processed to identify and track tropical cyclones. The ensemble members from each model are also combined into a 108‐member multi‐model ensemble. Track probability forecasts are produced for named tropical cyclones showing the probability of a location being within 120 km of a named tropical cyclone at any point in the next 7 days, and also broken down into each 24‐hour forecast period. This study presents the verification of these named‐storm track probabilities over a two‐year period across all global tropical cyclone basins, and compares the results from basin to basin. The combined multi‐model ensemble is found to increase the skill and value of the track probability forecasts over the best‐performing individual ensemble (ECMWF ENS), for both overall 7‐day track probability forecasts and 24‐hour track probabilities. Basin‐based and storm‐based verification illustrates that the best performing individual ensemble can change from basin to basin and from storm to storm, but that the multi‐model ensemble adds skill in every basin, and is also able to match the best performing individual ensemble in terms of overall probabilisticAbstract: At the Met Office, dynamic ensemble forecasts from the Met Office Global and Regional Ensemble Prediction System (MOGREPS‐G), the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Ensemble (ECMWF ENS) and National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Ensemble Forecast System (NCEP GEFS) global ensemble forecast models are post‐processed to identify and track tropical cyclones. The ensemble members from each model are also combined into a 108‐member multi‐model ensemble. Track probability forecasts are produced for named tropical cyclones showing the probability of a location being within 120 km of a named tropical cyclone at any point in the next 7 days, and also broken down into each 24‐hour forecast period. This study presents the verification of these named‐storm track probabilities over a two‐year period across all global tropical cyclone basins, and compares the results from basin to basin. The combined multi‐model ensemble is found to increase the skill and value of the track probability forecasts over the best‐performing individual ensemble (ECMWF ENS), for both overall 7‐day track probability forecasts and 24‐hour track probabilities. Basin‐based and storm‐based verification illustrates that the best performing individual ensemble can change from basin to basin and from storm to storm, but that the multi‐model ensemble adds skill in every basin, and is also able to match the best performing individual ensemble in terms of overall probabilistic forecast skill in several high‐profile case‐studies. This study helps to illustrate the potential value and skill to be gained if operational tropical cyclone forecasting can continue to migrate away from a deterministic‐focused forecasting environment to one where the probabilistic situation‐based uncertainty information provided by the dynamic multi‐model ensembles can be incorporated into operational forecasts and warnings. Abstract : Track probability forecasts for named tropical cyclones (as shown in the example for Hurricane Irma) are verified for three global ensembles and their combined multi‐model ensemble across all global basins. The multi‐model ensemble increases the skill and value of the track probability forecasts over the best‐performing individual ensemble in every basin. The skill shown compared to a deterministic consensus reference forecast illustrates the potential benefit of pulling through situation‐based uncertainty information from dynamic multi‐model ensembles into operational forecasts and warnings. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Volume 146:Number 726(2020)
- Journal:
- Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Issue:
- Volume 146:Number 726(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 146, Issue 726 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 146
- Issue:
- 726
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0146-0726-0000
- Page Start:
- 531
- Page End:
- 545
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-01
- Subjects:
- ensembles -- probabilistic forecasting -- tropical cyclones -- uncertainty -- verification
Meteorology -- Periodicals
551.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1477-870X/issues ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://www.ingentaselect.com/rpsv/cw/rms/00359009/contp1.htm ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/qj.3712 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0035-9009
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7186.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20457.xml