A sequence‐based method for predicting extant fold switchers that undergo α‐helix ↔ β‐strand transitions. Issue 10 (9th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mishra, Soumya; Looger, Loren L.; Porter, Lauren L.
• Other Names: LiWang Andy guestEditor.; Porter Lauren L. guestEditor.; Wang Lee‐Ping guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Biopolymers. Volume 112:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-09-09
• Subjects: fold‐switching proteins -- metamorphic proteins -- protein folding -- bioinformatics; Biopolymers -- Periodicals; Peptides -- Periodicals; Spectrum analysis -- Periodicals; 572.33
• DOI: 10.1002/bip.23471
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3525

Abstract

Abstract: Extant fold‐switching proteins remodel their secondary structures and change their functions in response to cellular stimuli, regulating biological processes and affecting human health. Despite their biological importance, these proteins remain understudied. Predictive methods are needed to expedite the process of discovering and characterizing more of these shapeshifting proteins. Most previous approaches require a solved structure or all‐atom simulations, greatly constraining their use. Here, we propose a high‐throughput sequence‐based method for predicting extant fold switchers that transition from α‐helix in one conformation to β‐strand in the other. This method leverages two previous observations: (a) α‐helix ↔ β‐strand prediction discrepancies from JPred4 are a robust predictor of fold switching, and (b) the fold‐switching regions (FSRs) of some extant fold switchers have different secondary structure propensities when expressed by themselves (isolated FSRs) than when expressed within the context of their parent protein (contextualized FSRs). Combining these two observations, we ran JPred4 on 99‐fold‐switching proteins and found strong correspondence between predicted and experimentally observed α‐helix ↔ β‐strand discrepancies. To test the overall robustness of this finding, we randomly selected regions of proteins not expected to switch folds (single‐fold proteins) and found significantly fewer predicted α‐helix ↔ β‐strand discrepancies. Combining these discrepancies with the overall percentage of predicted secondary structure, we developed a classifier to identify extant fold switchers (Matthews correlation coefficient of .71). Although this classifier had a high false‐negative rate (7/17), its false‐positive rate was very low (2/136), suggesting that it can be used to predict a subset of extant fold switchers from a multitude of available genomic sequences. Abstract :