Impact of washing cycles on the performances of face masks. (February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Charvet, Augustin; Bardin-Monnier, Nathalie; Thomas, Dominique; Dufaud, Olivier; Pfrimmer, Marielle; Barrault, Mathieu; Bourrous, Soleiman; Mocho, Victor; Ouf, François-Xavier; Poirier, Stéphane; Jeanmichel, Laurence; Segovia, César; Ferry, Daniel; Grauby, Olivier
• Is Part Of: Journal of aerosol science. Volume 160(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-02
• Subjects: Surgical masks -- FFP2 -- Reuse -- Washing -- Electrostatic charge; Aerosols -- Periodicals; Aerosols -- Periodicals; Aérosols -- Périodiques; 541.34515
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105914
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8502

Abstract

Abstract: The tension on the supply of surgical and FFP2 masks during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic leads to study the potential reuse of these masks. As washing is easily adaptable at home, this treatment solution was retained. In this work, thirty-six references of surgical masks and four FFP2 masks were tested without being worn or washed and after several washing cycles. The results highlighted a great heterogeneity of performances depending on the mask trademarks, both for surgical masks and FFP2. The quality of the meltblown and spunbond layers and the presence/absence of electrostatic charges at the fiber surface are put forward to explain the variability of results, both on differential pressures and filtration efficiencies. The differential pressure and the particle filtration efficiency of the washed masks were maintained up to 10 washing cycles and met the standard requirements. However, an immersion in water with a detergent induces an efficiency decrease for submicronic particles. This lower performance, constant after the first washing cycle, can be explained by the loss of electrostatic charges during the washing cycle. The modifications of surface properties after washing also lead to a loss of the hydrophobic behavior of type IIR surgical masks, which can therefore no more be considered as resistant to blood projections. Highlights: Great heterogeneity of performances depending on the mask trademarks. Loss of electrostatic charges during the washing cycle. No significant decrease of PFE up to 10 washing cycles for 3 μm particle diameter. Performance of the masks impacted by the washing for submicronic particles. Loss of blood projection resistance after a washing treatment for surgical masks.