Anterior Selective Lumbar Fusion Saving More Distal Fusion Segments Compared with Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 5: A Cohort Study with More Than 8‐Year Follow‐up. Issue 8 (9th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Zhi‐wei; Shen, Yuan‐qing; Wu, Yan; Li, Jun; Liu, Zhen; Xu, Jian‐kun; Chen, Qi‐xin; Chen, Wei‐shan; Chen, Lin‐wei; Zhang, Ning; Li, Fang‐cai
• Is Part Of: Orthopaedic surgery. Volume 13:Issue 8(2021)
• Page Start: 2327
• Page End: 2334
• Publication Date: 2021-11-09
• Subjects: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis -- Anterior -- Approach -- Posterior -- Selective fusion; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Musculoskeletal system -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; 617.47005
• DOI: 10.1111/os.13117
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-7853

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To investigate whether anterior selective fusion (ASF) could save more distal fusion segments compared with posterior approach in the treatment of Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with long term follow‐up. Methods: A retrospective cohort study. From 2008 to 2011, 22 AIS girls with Lenke type 5 who underwent ASF or posterior selective fusion (PSF) with more than 8‐year follow‐up, were extracted from the database. 13 girls in the ASF group had an average age of 14.3 ± 1.3 years and Risser sign of 3.3 ± 1.1; 9 PSF girls had an average age of 16.2 ± 3.6 years and Risser sign of 3.8 ± 1.5. The radiographic outcome was compared between groups preoperatively, 6‐month postoperatively, 8‐year postoperatively and at last follow‐up (>8 years). Results: The average follow‐up duration was 8.7 ± 0.4 (ASF) and 8.8 ± 0.5 (PSF) years, respectively. There was no significant difference at baseline in age, Risser sign and preoperative curve pattern in the coronal and sagittal plane between the groups ( P > 0.05). The ASF group had significantly shorter fusion segments (5.1 ± 0.6 vs. 7.0 ± 1.3) and decreased upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) (T11 ± 0.8 vs. T10 ± 0.8) than the PSF ( P < 0.05); while no significant difference was found in the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and distal reserved segments ( P > 0.05), which suggested that ASF could shorten the fusion segments by lowering UIV. The distal compensatory curve in the ASF group (9.0° ± 3.9°) was significantly larger than in the PSF group (3.3° ± 2.4°, P = 0.003), despite of no significant difference in the incidence of coronal imbalance ( P > 0.05), indicating that both two approaches could obtain satisfactory correction in the coronal plane. In the sagittal plane, PSF patients had significantly larger lumbar lordosis (LL, 59.1° ± 10.5°), thoracic kyphosis (TK, 37.2° ± 13.3°) and proximal junctional angle (PJA, 13.3° ± 6.1°) at the last follow‐up than the ASF (LL: 43.4° ± 9.4°; TK: 20.7° ± 8.4°; PJA: 4.7° ± 3.4°; P < 0.05), but without significant difference in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ( P > 0.05). After controlling for age, Risser sign, and radiographic parameters related to the primary curve pattern, shorter fusion segments and more distal reserved segments still remained significant in the ASF group with greater Risser sign ( P < 0.05). No major intra‐ or post‐operative complications occurred. Conclusions: Both ASF and PSF could obtain satisfactory coronal and sagittal correction for Lenke 5 AIS; compared with PSF, ASF could shorten the fusion segments by lowering UIV, and save more distal fusion segments only in patients with greater skeletal maturity. Abstract : Compared with PSF, ASF could shorten the fusion segments by lowering UIV, but only save distal fusion segments in patients with greater Risser sign due to the limited distal reserved segments. ASF had a relatively higher risk of curve progression at the distal segments in the coronal plane, while PSF showed a better correction effect on the sagittal profile despite a higher risk of PJA progression.