106 The effective study: development and application of a question-driven, time-effective cardiac magnetic resonance scanning protocol. (8th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Torlasco, Camilla; Castelletti, Silvia; Soranna, Davide; Volpato, Valentina; Figliozzi, Stefano; Menacho, Katia; Cernigliaro, Franco; Zambon, Antonella; Kellman, Peter; Moon, James C; Badano, Luigi Paolo; Parati, Gianfranco
• Is Part Of: European heart journal supplements. Volume 23(2021)Supplement G
• Publication Date: 2021-12-08
• Subjects: Cardiology -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Europe -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab132.053
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1520-765X

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Long scanning times impede cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) clinical uptake. A 'one-size-fits-all' shortened, focused protocol [e.g. only function and late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE)] reduces scanning time and costs, but provide less information. We developed two question-driven CMR and stress-CMR protocols, including tailored advanced tissue characterization, and tested their effectiveness in reducing scanning time while retaining the diagnostic performances of standard protocols. Methods and results: Eighty-three consecutive patients with cardiomyopathy or ischaemic heart disease underwent the tailored CMR. Each scan consisted of standard cines, LGE imaging, native T1-mapping, and extracellular volume. Fat/oedema modules, right ventricle cine, and in-line quantitative perfusion mapping were performed as clinically required. Workflow was optimized to avoid gaps. See Figure 1 for protocol details. Time target was <30 min for a CMR and <35 min for a stress-CMR. CMR was considered impactful when its results drove changes in diagnosis or management. Advanced tissue characterization was considered impactful when it changed the confidence level in the diagnosis. Images' quality was assessed. A 'control group' of 137 patients was identified among scans performed before February 2020. Compared to standard protocols, the average scan duration dropped by > 30% (CMR: from 42 ± 8 to 28 ± 6min; stress-CMR: from 50 ± 10 to 34 ± 6min, both P < 0.0001). Independent on the protocol, CMR was impactful in ∼60% cases, and advanced tissue characterization was impactful in > 45% of cases. Quality grading was similar between the two protocols. Tailored protocols did not require additional staff. Conclusions: Tailored CMR and stress-CMR protocols including advanced tissue characterization are accurate and time-effective for cardiomyopathies and ischaemic heart disease.