214 Covered stent in a chest trauma: congenital coronary arterial fistula or traumatic coronary perforation?. (8th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marsico, Fabio; Carpinella, Gerardo; Scalise, Martina; Esposito, Mafalda; Furbatto, Fulvio; D'Andrea, Davide; Serino, Federica; Ziviello, Francesca; Rumolo, Salvatore; Bitello, Carlo; Crispo, Salvatore; Mauro, Ciro
• Is Part Of: European heart journal supplements. Volume 23(2021)Supplement G
• Publication Date: 2021-12-08
• Subjects: Cardiology -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Europe -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab134.028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1520-765X

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Coronary arterial fistula consists in a communication between a coronary artery and a cardiac cavity. It is tipically a congenital condition, but it can also be a result of invasive cardiac procedure. Although chest truama generally evolve to massive pericardial effusion, in some cases it can determine also a coronary perforation, with a consequent coronary arterial fistula. Methods and results: A 22-year-old male patient, with no cardiovascular history, was admitted after a road accident, reporting pelvis break, 17 costal break, and sternal break, with consequent chest pain. On admission the patient had a heart rate of 100 b.p.m. and a blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg. Elettrocardiogram (ECG) reported ST elevation in antero-septal derivations (V1–V4). Echocardiogram showed a global left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of 55%, with an apical-septal akinesia, with a minimal anterior pericardial effusion, not emodinamically significant. So, an emergency coronary angiography was performed, showing a fistula of the distal segment of the left anterior discendent coronary (LAD). In this case there were two possible options, a previously unknown congenital coronary arterial fistula, or a traumatic coronary perforation, determining a coronary arterial fistula. Considering the possibility of a traumatic coronary perforation, with the consequent risk of rapid pericardial effusion worsening, the decision was to perform percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a covered stent (Biotronik Papyrus 2.5 × 20 mm, 8 atm), with a good final result, with total occlusion of fistula. Conclusions: At 1 month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic for dyspnoea or chest pain, with a heart rate of 70 b.p.m. and a blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg. ECG showed no anomalies in ST-T tract.