39 CAN CARE ROBOTS ASSIST OLDER PEOPLE AND LONG-TERM CARE SYSTEMS? KEY STAKEHOLDERS' PERCEPTIONS IN HONG KONG SAR, CHINA AND IRELAND. (18th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kodate, N; Donnelly, S; Cheung, M-c; Maeda, Y; Mannan, H; Chan, WC-h; O'Shea, D
• Is Part Of: Age and ageing. Volume 50(2021)Supplement 3
• Publication Date: 2021-11-18
• Subjects: Aging -- Periodicals; Geriatrics -- Periodicals; 618.97
• DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab219.39
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-0729

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Robotics is now seen as part of the solution to the ageing population internationally, and is deployed in care settings. Care robots are designed to enable active ageing as well as ageing in place, with support to older persons, their families, and care professionals. The aim of this study was to understand the perceptions of stakeholders in Hong Kong and Ireland regarding the current state of affairs surrounding the use of care robots in their jurisdictions. Methods: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 experts (15 from each jurisdiction). The participants included care professionals, service providers, researchers, and advocacy group representatives and policymakers. The questions explored their knowledge of and perceptions regarding the current use of assistive technologies, long-term care systems, and their own future vision of care provision for old age. Results: In both jurisdictions, the use of care robots is relatively new, although many respondents were familiar with the seal robot PARO and the humanoid robot Pepper . In Hong Kong, a gerontechnology-specific exposition has become an annual feature in recent years, and the government's investment has stepped up. In Ireland, a more general ehealth agenda has been adopted within the government's planned care reform (Sláintecare). Older people in Hong Kong and Ireland are believed to fall through the cracks in their respective two-tier care systems, and many respondents stated that care robots are most needed in order to fill the gaps (e.g. safety monitoring, mobility support). Concerns regarding the impact of using robots included a possible reduction in human-to-human contact and deskilling of older people themselves. Conclusion: There was a sense of urgency in both jurisdictions that more smart and digital technologies should be utilised to ease the pressures on care professionals and systems. However, a degree of optimism was noted for technological leapfrogging after the pandemic.