Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations. (January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations. (January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations
- Authors:
- Chambers, Josephine M.
Wyborn, Carina
Klenk, Nicole L.
Ryan, Melanie
Serban, Anca
Bennett, Nathan J.
Brennan, Ruth
Charli-Joseph, Lakshmi
Fernández-Giménez, María E.
Galvin, Kathleen A.
Goldstein, Bruce E.
Haller, Tobias
Hill, Rosemary
Munera, Claudia
Nel, Jeanne L.
Österblom, Henrik
Reid, Robin S.
Riechers, Maraja
Spierenburg, Marja
Tengö, Maria
Bennett, Elena
Brandeis, Amos
Chatterton, Paul
Cockburn, Jessica J.
Cvitanovic, Christopher
Dumrongrojwatthana, Pongchai
Paz Durán, América
Gerber, Jean-David
Green, Jonathan M.H.
Gruby, Rebecca
Guerrero, Angela M.
Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana
Montana, Jasper
Steyaert, Patrick
Zaehringer, Julie G.
Bednarek, Angela T.
Curran, K
Fada, Salamatu J.
Hutton, Jon
Leimona, Beria
Pickering, Tomas
Rondeau, Renee
… (more) - Abstract:
- Graphical abstract: Highlights: Explores how co-production processes can enable sustainability transformations. Four archetypes can hinder transformation: hero, host, woodpecker, genie. Co-productive agility opens up multiple pathways to transformation. Introduces a framework to enable agility in sustainability transformations. Challenges the tendency to close down rather than open up agendas for change. Abstract: Co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice by diverse societal actors, is argued to play an important role in sustainability transformations. Yet, there is still poor understanding of how to navigate the tensions that emerge in these processes. Through analyzing 32 initiatives worldwide that co-produced knowledge and action to foster sustainable social-ecological relations, we conceptualize 'co-productive agility' as an emergent feature vital for turning tensions into transformations. Co-productive agility refers to the willingness and ability of diverse actors to iteratively engage in reflexive dialogues to grow shared ideas and actions that would not have been possible from the outset. It relies on embedding knowledge production within processes of change to constantly recognize, reposition, and navigate tensions and opportunities. Co-productive agility opens up multiple pathways to transformation through: (1) elevating marginalized agendas in ways that maintain their integrity and broaden struggles for justice; (2) questioning dominantGraphical abstract: Highlights: Explores how co-production processes can enable sustainability transformations. Four archetypes can hinder transformation: hero, host, woodpecker, genie. Co-productive agility opens up multiple pathways to transformation. Introduces a framework to enable agility in sustainability transformations. Challenges the tendency to close down rather than open up agendas for change. Abstract: Co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice by diverse societal actors, is argued to play an important role in sustainability transformations. Yet, there is still poor understanding of how to navigate the tensions that emerge in these processes. Through analyzing 32 initiatives worldwide that co-produced knowledge and action to foster sustainable social-ecological relations, we conceptualize 'co-productive agility' as an emergent feature vital for turning tensions into transformations. Co-productive agility refers to the willingness and ability of diverse actors to iteratively engage in reflexive dialogues to grow shared ideas and actions that would not have been possible from the outset. It relies on embedding knowledge production within processes of change to constantly recognize, reposition, and navigate tensions and opportunities. Co-productive agility opens up multiple pathways to transformation through: (1) elevating marginalized agendas in ways that maintain their integrity and broaden struggles for justice; (2) questioning dominant agendas by engaging with power in ways that challenge assumptions, (3) navigating conflicting agendas to actively transform interlinked paradigms, practices, and structures; (4) exploring diverse agendas to foster learning and mutual respect for a plurality of perspectives. We explore six process considerations that vary by these four pathways and provide a framework to enable agility in sustainability transformations. We argue that research and practice spend too much time closing down debate over different agendas for change – thereby avoiding, suppressing, or polarizing tensions, and call for more efforts to facilitate better interactions among different agendas. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Global environmental change. Volume 72(2022)
- Journal:
- Global environmental change
- Issue:
- Volume 72(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 72, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 72
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0072-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01
- Subjects:
- Co-production -- Transformative processes -- Social-ecological relations -- Tensions -- Power relations -- Impact
Environmental policy -- Periodicals
Human ecology -- Periodicals
Nature -- Effect of human beings on -- Periodicals
Environment -- Periodicals
Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques
Écologie humaine -- Périodiques
Homme -- Influence sur la nature -- Périodiques
Environmental policy
Human ecology
Nature -- Effect of human beings on
Periodicals
Electronic journals
333.7 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09593780 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102422 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-3780
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4195.397000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20386.xml