Performance of four commercial real-time PCR assays for the detection of bacterial enteric pathogens in clinical samples. (January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Performance of four commercial real-time PCR assays for the detection of bacterial enteric pathogens in clinical samples. (January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Performance of four commercial real-time PCR assays for the detection of bacterial enteric pathogens in clinical samples
- Authors:
- Berenger, Byron M.
Chui, Linda
Ferrato, Christina
Lloyd, Tracie
Li, Vincent
Pillai, Dylan R. - Abstract:
- Highlights: This study compared four commercial RT-PCR tests for bacterial gastroenteritis to culture There was >90% agreement for C. jejuni, Salmonella, and STEC Agreement for Yersinia enterocolitica ranged from 70-90% compared to culture Only one RT-PCR detected stx2f ; none detected other Yersinia spp. or C. upsaliensis These findings highlight some gaps in diagnosis and surveillance when using RT-PCR Abstract: Objectives: Many laboratories use culture-independent diagnostic tests for bacterial gastroenteritis (i.e. real-time polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) instead of culture because of better sensitivity, automation, and faster turnaround times. To address some gaps in initial evaluations and lack of intraassay comparisons for many commercial RT-PCRs, this study compared the ability of four commercially available RT-PCR tests (Ridagene, Fast Track Diagnostics, BD Max, and Prodesse Progastro) to detect five major bacterial enteric pathogens: Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC), Shigella, and Yersinia. Methods: Clinical stool specimens and contrived samples comprising commonly circulating species, serotypes, biovars, and/or toxin subtypes were used for the comparison. Results: Concordance rates for RT-PCR and culture using culture-positive and culture-negative clinical stools were >90% for Campylobacter (97.5-100%), Salmonella (97.5-100%), Shigella (100%), and STEC (90-100%). However, the agreement between RT-PCR and culture for Y.Highlights: This study compared four commercial RT-PCR tests for bacterial gastroenteritis to culture There was >90% agreement for C. jejuni, Salmonella, and STEC Agreement for Yersinia enterocolitica ranged from 70-90% compared to culture Only one RT-PCR detected stx2f ; none detected other Yersinia spp. or C. upsaliensis These findings highlight some gaps in diagnosis and surveillance when using RT-PCR Abstract: Objectives: Many laboratories use culture-independent diagnostic tests for bacterial gastroenteritis (i.e. real-time polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) instead of culture because of better sensitivity, automation, and faster turnaround times. To address some gaps in initial evaluations and lack of intraassay comparisons for many commercial RT-PCRs, this study compared the ability of four commercially available RT-PCR tests (Ridagene, Fast Track Diagnostics, BD Max, and Prodesse Progastro) to detect five major bacterial enteric pathogens: Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC), Shigella, and Yersinia. Methods: Clinical stool specimens and contrived samples comprising commonly circulating species, serotypes, biovars, and/or toxin subtypes were used for the comparison. Results: Concordance rates for RT-PCR and culture using culture-positive and culture-negative clinical stools were >90% for Campylobacter (97.5-100%), Salmonella (97.5-100%), Shigella (100%), and STEC (90-100%). However, the agreement between RT-PCR and culture for Y. enteroccolitica ranged from 70-90%. For the contrived sample set, stx2f was detected by one of four assays. Of note, no assay could detect Yersinia non- enterocolitica and Campylobacter upsaliensis. Conclusions: Depending on the prevalence of certain stx sub-types, Yersinia species, and Campylobacter species in a laboratory's jurisdiction, without further improvement in culture-independent tests, culture methods remain critical for the detection of these pathogens. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of infectious diseases. Volume 114(2022)
- Journal:
- International journal of infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 114(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 114, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 114
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0114-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- 195
- Page End:
- 201
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01
- Subjects:
- Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli -- Yersinia -- Campylobacter -- Salmonella enterica -- Shigella -- Multiplex polymerase chain reaction
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Communicable Diseases -- Periodicals
Communicable diseases
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.9 - Journal URLs:
- http://bibpurl.oclc.org/web/73769 ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-infectious-diseases/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/12019712 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/12019712 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/12019712 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.035 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1201-9712
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.304750
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20381.xml