Shear wave velocity measurements obtained in different regions are repeatable for presumed normal canine lymph nodes: A pilot study. Issue 1 (3rd October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Favril, Sophie; de Rooster, Hilde; Broeckx, Bart J.G.; Stock, Emmelie; Vanderperren, Katrien
• Is Part Of: Veterinary radiology & ultrasound. Volume 63:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 102
• Page End: 110
• Publication Date: 2021-10-03
• Subjects: intra‐ and interobserver study -- normal lymph nodes -- shear wave imaging; Veterinary radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie vétérinaire -- Périodiques; Échographie vétérinaire -- Périodiques; Radiography -- Periodicals; Ultrasonography -- Periodicals; Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Veterinary Medicine -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; 636.089607
• DOI: 10.1111/vru.13021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1058-8183

Abstract

Abstract: Shear wave elastography (SWE) has been applied as a noninvasive method for predicting regional lymph node (LN) metastases in human and veterinary patients. However, published studies describing standardized protocols and repeatability of this technique are currently lacking. The objective of this prospective, pilot, observer agreement study was to determine whether different shear wave velocity (SWV) measurements obtained in different regions of presumed normal canine LNs would be repeatable. Two imagers consecutively performed shear wave elastography of submandibular, superficial inguinal, and popliteal LNs in 10, clinically healthy adult dogs. Ten elastograms of each LN were acquired by each imager. In each adequate elastogram, three regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the softest and stiffest region of the LN. Additionally, one ROI was drawn covering the entire LN. In each ROI, mean, median, and maximum SWVs were calculated. Mean values for the mean, median, and maximum SWVs varied from 2.33 to 3.10 m/s, 2.32 to 3.10 m/s, and 2.61 to 4.09 m/s, respectively. Intra‐ and interobserver agreements were acceptable. Superficial inguinal LNs demonstrated the highest intra‐ and interobserver agreement, followed by the popliteal and the submandibular LNs, respectively. Using the different measurements (mean, median, or maximum SWVs) had no significant effect on the intra‐ and interobserver variability, neither did the region (softest, stiffest, or entire LN). Findings indicated that all evaluated measurements and regions could be used to obtain reliable elastography data of presumed normal canine LNs. Clinical trials in dogs with cancer are necessary to compare SWVs of metastatic LNs with the reported SWVs and evaluate whether various measurements and regions can also be used in metastatic LNs.