Belantamab mafodotin for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in heavily pretreated patients: a US cost-effectiveness analysis. Issue 12 (2nd December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nikolaou, Andreas; Ambavane, Apoorva; Shah, Anshul; Ma, Wenkang; Tosh, Jon; Kapetanakis, Venediktos; Willson, Jenny; Wang, Feng; Hogea, Cosmina; Gorsh, Boris; Gutierrez, Ben; Sapra, Sandhya; Suvannasankha, Attaya; Samyshkin, Yevgeniy
• Is Part Of: Expert review of hematology. Volume 14:Issue 12(2021)
• Page Start: 1137
• Page End: 1145
• Publication Date: 2021-12-02
• Subjects: Cost-effectiveness -- efficacy -- HRQoL -- modeling -- RRMM -- safety; Hematology -- Periodicals; 616.15005
• DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2021.1970522
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-4086

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) require several lines of therapy, with typically shorter remission duration with each additional line. Research design and methods: The cost-effectiveness of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; DREAMM-2; NCT03525678) was compared with selinexor plus dexamethasone (SEL+DEX; STORM Part 2; NCT02336815) among patients with RRMM who have received at least four prior therapies. The base case used a US commercial payer's perspective over a 10-year time horizon. Efficacy data were based on parametric survival analysis of DREAMM-2 and matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison between DREAMM-2 and STORM Part 2, which assessed relative treatment effects between belamaf and SEL+DEX. Cost inputs included drug treatment, concomitant medications, adverse event management, subsequent treatments, and disease management. Results: Belamaf decreased total treatment costs per patient by $14, 267 and increased patient life years by 0.74 and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.49 versus SEL+DEX. Patients receiving belamaf accrued 0.12 fewer progression-free life years versus patients on SEL+DEX. Conclusions: From a US commercial payer's perspective, belamaf had lower costs, and increased QALYs and life-year gain, compared with SEL+DEX. Belamaf is therefore likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with RRMM who have received four or more prior lines of therapy.