Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Second Primary Lung Cancer. (13th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Choi, Eunji; Sanyal, Nilotpal; Ding, Victoria Y; Gardner, Rebecca M; Aredo, Jacqueline V; Lee, Justin; Wu, Julie T; Hickey, Thomas P; Barrett, Brian; Riley, Thomas L; Wilkens, Lynne R; Leung, Ann N; Le Marchand, Loïc; Tammemägi, Martin C; Hung, Rayjean J; Amos, Christopher I; Freedman, Neal D; Cheng, Iona; Wakelee, Heather A; Han, Summer S
• Is Part Of: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Volume 114:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 87
• Page End: 96
• Publication Date: 2021-07-13
• Subjects: Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Research -- Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab138
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0027-8874

Abstract

Abstract: Background: With advancing therapeutics, lung cancer (LC) survivors are rapidly increasing in number. Although mounting evidence suggests LC survivors have high risk of second primary lung cancer (SPLC), there is no validated prediction model available for clinical use to identify high-risk LC survivors for SPLC. Methods: Using data from 6325 ever-smokers in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) study diagnosed with initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) in 1993-2017, we developed a prediction model for 10-year SPLC risk after IPLC diagnosis using cause-specific Cox regression. We evaluated the model's clinical utility using decision curve analysis and externally validated it using 2 population-based data—Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and National Lung Screening Trial (NLST)—that included 2963 and 2844 IPLC (101 and 93 SPLC cases), respectively. Results: Over 14 063 person-years, 145 (2.3%) ever-smoking IPLC patients developed SPLC in MEC. Our prediction model demonstrated a high predictive accuracy (Brier score = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.4 to 3.3) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristics [AUC] = 81.9%, 95% CI = 78.2% to 85.5%) based on bootstrap validation in MEC. Stratification by the estimated risk quartiles showed that the observed SPLC incidence was statistically significantly higher in the 4th vs 1st quartile (9.5% vs 0.2%; P < .001). Decision curve analysis indicated that in a wide range of 10-year risk thresholds from 1% to 20%, the model yielded a larger net-benefit vs hypothetical all-screening or no-screening scenarios. External validation using PLCO and NLST showed an AUC of 78.8% (95% CI = 74.6% to 82.9%) and 72.7% (95% CI = 67.7% to 77.7%), respectively. Conclusions: We developed and validated a SPLC prediction model based on large population-based cohorts. The proposed prediction model can help identify high-risk LC patients for SPLC and can be incorporated into clinical decision making for SPLC surveillance and screening.