Clinical relevance of attentional biases in pediatric chronic pain: an eye-tracking study. Issue 2 (20th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Soltani, Sabine; van Ryckeghem, Dimitri M.L.; Vervoort, Tine; Heathcote, Lauren C.; Yeates, Keith O.; Sears, Christopher; Noel, Melanie
• Is Part Of: Pain. Volume 163:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: e261
• Page End: e273
• Publication Date: 2022-02-20
• Subjects: Attentional bias -- Eye-tracking -- Pain facial expressions -- Chronic pain -- Youth -- Pediatric -- Pain catastrophizing -- Anxiety sensitivity -- Fear of pain -- Anxiety -- Depression -- Posttraumatic stress; Pain -- Periodicals; Douleur -- Périodiques; Anesthésie -- Périodiques; Pain; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.0472
• DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002346
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0304-3959

Abstract

Abstract : Attentional bias was demonstrated in youth with and without chronic pain using eye-tracking. Attentional bias was not associated with key theorized antecedents or clinical outcomes. Abstract: Attentional biases have been posited as one of the key mechanisms underlying the development and maintenance of chronic pain and co-occurring internalizing mental health symptoms. Despite this theoretical prominence, a comprehensive understanding of the nature of biased attentional processing in chronic pain and its relationship to theorized antecedents and clinical outcomes is lacking, particularly in youth. This study used eye-tracking to assess attentional bias for painful facial expressions and its relationship to theorized antecedents of chronic pain and clinical outcomes. Youth with chronic pain (n = 125) and without chronic pain (n = 52) viewed face images of varying levels of pain expressiveness while their eye gaze was tracked and recorded. At baseline, youth completed questionnaires to assess pain characteristics, theorized antecedents (pain catastrophizing, fear of pain, and anxiety sensitivity), and clinical outcomes (pain intensity, interference, anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress). For youth with chronic pain, clinical outcomes were reassessed at 3 months to assess for relationships with attentional bias while controlling for baseline symptoms. In both groups, youth exhibited an attentional bias for painful facial expressions. For youth with chronic pain, attentional bias was not significantly associated with theorized antecedents or clinical outcomes at baseline or 3-month follow-up. These findings call into question the posited relationships between attentional bias and clinical outcomes. Additional studies using more comprehensive and contextual paradigms for the assessment of attentional bias are required to clarify the ways in which such biases may manifest and relate to clinical outcomes.