Sex differences in assessing stenosis severity between physician visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography. (1st February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xu, Xiuxiu; Fam, Jiang Ming; Low, Adrian Fatt Hoe; Tan, Ru-San; Chai, Ping; Leng, Shuang; Allen, John; Teo, Lynette LS; Ong, Ching Ching; Chan, Mark Yan-Yee; Huang, Tieqiu; Wong, Aaron Sung Lung; Wu, Qinghua; Lim, Soo Teik; Zhong, Liang
• Is Part Of: International journal of cardiology. Volume 348(2022)
• Page Start: 9
• Page End: 14
• Publication Date: 2022-02-01
• Subjects: Sex difference -- Quantitative coronary angiography -- Physician visual assessment -- Coronary artery disease -- Diameter stenosis; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.089
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-5273

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Physician visual assessment (PVA) in invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the current clinical method to determine stenosis severity and guide percutaneous coronary intervention. This study sought to evaluate the effect of sex differences in assessing coronary stenosis severity between PVA and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Methods: 209 patients with coronary artery disease (288 coronary lesions) underwent ICA and fractional flow reserve (FFR). ICA image processing including PVA and QCA was used to quantify diameter stenosis (DS). The difference of DS (ΔDS) between PVA and QCA was defined as DSPVA -DSQCA . DS ≥50% was considered anatomically obstructive. FFR ≤0.8 was defined as myocardial ischemia. Results: Mean ± SD age was 63 ± 9 years. There were no significant differences in DSPVA (61.1 ± 16.3% vs 60.1 ± 18.9%) and DSQCA (53.1 ± 12.1% vs 55.4 ± 14.3%) between females and males. However, ΔDS between PVA and QCA was higher in females (8.0 ± 10.9%) than in males (4.7 ± 10.9%) ( P = 0.03). Thirty-four of 72 vessels (47.2%) in female patients and 75 of 216 vessels (34.7%) in male patients were classified differently by at least one grade using PVA compared to QCA assessment. DSPVA and DSQCA were negatively correlated with FFR in females ( r PVA = −0.397, r QCA = −0.448) with an even stronger negative correlation in males ( r PVA = −0.607, r QCA = −0.607). ROC analysis demonstrated that DSQCA had better discrimination capability for myocardial ischemia (FFR ≤ 0.80) than DSPVA in both sexes ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: A systematic bias was found in PVA (QCA reference) for overestimating severity of coronary artery disease in females compared to males. Highlights: We compared physician visual assessment (PVA) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in both sexes to assess stenosis. The association of PVA and QCA with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) was investigated in both sexes. PVA tended to overestimate the assessment of diameter stenosis, with greater overestimation in females than in males. Accuracy of PVA and QCA in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia (FFR < 0.8) was inferior in female patients. QCA and FFR should be integrated into clinical practice to ensure more precise assessment of coronary stenosis in females.