Routine postoperative noninvasive respiratory support and pneumonia after elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. (February 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Routine postoperative noninvasive respiratory support and pneumonia after elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. (February 2022)
- Main Title:
- Routine postoperative noninvasive respiratory support and pneumonia after elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
- Authors:
- Hui, Sara
Fowler, Alexander J.
Cashmore, Richard M.J.
Fisher, Thomas J.
Schlautmann, Jonas
Body, Suzanne
Lan-Pak-Kee, Valerie
Webb, Maylan
Kyriakides, Maria
Ng, Jing Yong
Chisvo, Nathan S.
Pearse, Rupert M.
Abbott, Tom E.F. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications, including pneumonia, are a substantial cause of morbidity. We hypothesised that routine noninvasive respiratory support was associated with a lower incidence of pneumonia after surgery. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the routine use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), or high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) against standard postoperative care in the adult population. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and CENTRAL from the start of indexing to July 27, 2021. Articles were reviewed and data extracted in duplicate, with discrepancies resolved by a senior investigator. The primary outcome was pneumonia, and the secondary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications. We calculated risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: From 18 513 records, we included 38 trials consisting of 9782 patients. Pneumonia occurred in 214/4403 (4.9%) patients receiving noninvasive respiratory support compared with 216/3937 (5.5%) receiving standard care (RD −0.01 [95% confidence interval: −0.02 to 0.00]; I 2 =8%; P =0.23). Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 393/1379 (28%) patients receiving noninvasive respiratory support compared with 280/902 (31%) receiving standard care (RD −0.11 [−0.23 to 0.01]; I 2 =79%; P =0.07).Abstract: Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications, including pneumonia, are a substantial cause of morbidity. We hypothesised that routine noninvasive respiratory support was associated with a lower incidence of pneumonia after surgery. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the routine use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), or high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) against standard postoperative care in the adult population. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and CENTRAL from the start of indexing to July 27, 2021. Articles were reviewed and data extracted in duplicate, with discrepancies resolved by a senior investigator. The primary outcome was pneumonia, and the secondary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications. We calculated risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: From 18 513 records, we included 38 trials consisting of 9782 patients. Pneumonia occurred in 214/4403 (4.9%) patients receiving noninvasive respiratory support compared with 216/3937 (5.5%) receiving standard care (RD −0.01 [95% confidence interval: −0.02 to 0.00]; I 2 =8%; P =0.23). Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 393/1379 (28%) patients receiving noninvasive respiratory support compared with 280/902 (31%) receiving standard care (RD −0.11 [−0.23 to 0.01]; I 2 =79%; P =0.07). Subgroup analyses did not identify a benefit of CPAP, NIV, or HFNO in preventing pneumonia. Tests for publication bias suggest six unreported trials. Conclusion: The results of this evidence synthesis do not support the routine use of postoperative CPAP, NIV, or HFNO to prevent pneumonia after surgery in adults. Clinical trial registration: PROSPERO: CRD42019156741. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of anaesthesia. Volume 128:Number 2(2022)
- Journal:
- British journal of anaesthesia
- Issue:
- Volume 128:Number 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 128, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 128
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0128-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 363
- Page End:
- 374
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02
- Subjects:
- anaesthesia -- critical care -- meta-analysis -- noninvasive ventilation -- postoperative complications -- pulmonary complications -- surgery
Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
Anesthesia -- Periodicals
617.9605 - Journal URLs:
- http://bja.oupjournals.org ↗
http://bja.oxfordjournals.org ↗
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/british-journal-of-anaesthesia ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.047 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-0912
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2303.900000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20344.xml