Perioral volumization using a temperature controlled fractionated radiofrequency device. (27th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boisen, Julie; Alkul, Suzanne; Malone, Cedar H.; Munavalli, Gilly
• Is Part Of: Journal of cosmetic dermatology. Volume 21:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 237
• Page End: 241
• Publication Date: 2021-03-27
• Subjects: bipolar radiofrequency microneedling -- perioral rejuvenation -- volumization; Skin -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Lasers in surgery -- Periodicals; Skin -- Pathophysiology -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 616.5
• DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14083
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1473-2130

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aims: Cosmetic rejuvenation of the perioral area can be challenging due to a mix of skin laxity and volumetric loss. Current techniques including fillers, neurotoxins, and non‐ablative and ablative resurfacing have several drawbacks and can create a stiff, box‐shaped, unnatural appearance. Aside from filler, these techniques do not address deeper volume deficiency. Temperature controlled fractionated radiofrequency (FRF) provides consistent formation of new collagen, elastin, and hyaluronic acid. This has been reported to provide long‐lasting results for the treatment of skin laxity and volume loss of the face and neck with a single treatment, but it has not been previously reported for perioral rejuvenation. Patients/Methods: We present a series of seven patients who were treated with perioral FRF, and we assessed their results objectively using a published, validated scale for lower face laxity. Results: All of the patients in this case series showed improvement on the Facial Laxity Rating (FLR) scale after FRF treatment. Conclusions: This case series represents the first reported use of temperature controlled FRF for perioral rejuvenation. FRF is a promising option for low‐risk, natural perioral rejuvenation with long‐lasting results and few risks.