What's in a name? A data-driven method to identify optimal psychotherapy classifications to advance treatment research on co-occurring PTSD and substance use disorders. Issue 1 (31st December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hien, Denise A.; Fitzpatrick, Skye; Saavedra, Lissette M.; Ebrahimi, Chantel T.; Norman, Sonya B.; Tripp, Jessica; Ruglass, Lesia M.; Lopez-Castro, Teresa; Killeen, Therese K.; Back, Sudie E.; Morgan-López, Antonio A.
• Is Part Of: European journal of psychotraumatology. Volume 13:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12-31
• Subjects: Posttraumatic stress disorder -- substance use disorder -- dual diagnosis -- treatment classification -- co-occurring disorders; Trastorno de estrés postraumático -- trastorno por uso de sustancias -- patología dual -- clasificación de tratamiento -- trastornos comórbidos; 创伤后应激障碍 -- 物质使用障碍 -- 双重诊断 -- 治疗分类 -- 并发障碍; Post-traumatic stress disorder -- Periodicals; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 616.8521
• DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2001191
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2000-8198

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background/Objective: The present study leveraged the expertise of an international group of posttraumatic stress and substance use disorder (PTSD+SUD) intervention researchers to identify which methods of categorizing interventions which target SUD, PTSD, or PTSD+SUD for populations with both PTSD+SUD may be optimal for advancing future systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comparative effectiveness studies which strive to compare effects across a broad variety of psychotherapy types. Method: A two-step process was used to evaluate the categorization terminology. First, we searched the literature for pre-existing categories of PTSD+SUD interventions from PTSD+SUD clinical trials, systematic and literature reviews. Then, we surveyed international trauma and substance use subject matter experts about their opinions on pre-existing intervention categorization and ideal categorization nomenclature. Results: Mixed method analyses revealed that a proliferation of PTSD+SUD treatment research over the last twenty years brought with it an abundance of ways to characterize the treatments that have been evaluated. Results from our survey of experts ( N = 27) revealed that interventions for PTSD+SUD can be classified in many ways that appear to overlap highly with one another. Many experts (11/27; 41%) selected the categories of 'trauma-focused and non-trauma focused' as an optimal way to distinguish treatment types. Although several experts reinforced this point during the subsequent meeting, it became clear that no method of categorizing treatments is without flaws. Conclusion: One possible categorization (trauma-focused/non-trauma focused) was identified. Revised language and nomenclature for classification of PTSD+SUD treatments are needed in order to accommodate the needs of this advancing field. HIGHLIGHTS: Experts in PTSD+SUD clinical trials were surveyed to identify principles for treatment classification of PTSD+SUD behavioural therapies. Results indicated some consensus around 'trauma-focused' vs 'non-trauma-focused' as one designation but further agreement is needed.