Physician factors associated with medical errors in Norwegian primary care emergency services. (2nd October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bratland, Svein Zander; Baste, Valborg; Steen, Knut; Diaz, Esperanza; Bondevik, Gunnar Tschudi
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Volume 39:Number 4(2021)
• Page Start: 429
• Page End: 437
• Publication Date: 2021-10-02
• Subjects: Emergency medical services -- general practice -- general practitioners -- health services research -- medical audit -- medical errors -- patient complaints; Primary health care -- Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1973240
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0281-3432

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the associations between characteristics of physicians working in primary care emergency units (PCEUs) and the outcome of assessments of the medical records. Design: Data from a previous case-control study was used to evaluate factors related to medical errors. Setting: Ten Norwegian PCEUs were included. Subjects: Physicians that had evoked a patient complaint, and a random sample of three physicians from the same PCEU and time period as the physician who had evoked a complaint. Recorded physician characteristics were: gender, seniority, citizenship at, and years after authorization as a physician, specialty in general practice, and workload at the PCEU. Main outcome measures: Assessments of the medical records: errors that may have led to harm, no medical error, or inconclusive. Results: In the complaint group 77 physicians were included, and in the random sample group 217. In the first group, 53.2% of the medical records were assessed as revealing medical errors. In the random sample group, this percentage was 3.2. In the complaint group the percentages for no-error and inconclusive for the female physicians were 30.8 and 15.4; and for the male physicians 9.8 and 27.3, p = 0.027. Conclusion: In the group of complaints there was a higher percentage with no assessed medical error, and a lower percentage with inconclusive assessments of medical errors, among female physicians compared to their male colleagues. We found no other physician factors that were associated with assessed medical errors. Future research should focus on the underlying elements of these findings. Key points: Medical errors are among the leading causes of death and they are essentially avoidable. Primary care emergency units are a vulnerable arena for committing medical errors. By assessing the medical records of a group of physicians who had evoked a complaint, no differences related to physician factors were revealed in the incidence of medical errors. In the group of female physicians, the proportion of no-errors, was higher, and the percentage of inconclusive medical records was lower than for their male colleagues. The Norwegian regulations on independent participation in PCEUs may have modulated these results.