Multidisciplinary team approach in critically ill COVID-19 patients reduced pronation-related complications rate: A retrospective cohort study. (October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ceruti, Samuele; Glotta, Andrea; Biggiogero, Maira; Bona, Giovanni; Saporito, Andrea; Faldarini, Nicola; Olivieri, Diana; Molteni, Claudia; Petazzi, Stefano; Capdevila, Xavier
• Is Part Of: Annals of medicine and surgery. Volume 70(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-10
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- Critical care outcome -- Intensive care unit -- Pronation -- Respiratory distress syndrome -- SARS-COV-2; Surgery -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; General Surgery -- Periodicals; Education, Medical -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 617
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102836
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2049-0801

Abstract

Abstract: Background: In the pandemic scenario, critically ill COVID-19 patients' management presented an increased workload for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nursing staff, particularly during pronation maneuvers, with high risk of complications. In this contest, some authors described an increase in complications incidence after pronation. An ICU Pronation Team (IPT) was implemented to support this maneuver. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive critically ill COVID-19 patients in COVID-19 Center in southern Switzerland, between March and April 2020. Aim of the study was to determine rates and characteristics of pronation-related complications managed by IPT according to standard protocols. Results: Forty-two patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) were enrolled; 296 prone/supine positioning were performed, with 3.52 cycles/patient. All patients were equipped with arterial line, central venous catheter, urinary catheter, 28 (66%) endotracheal tube, 8 (19%), tracheostomy, 6 (14%) dialysis catheter, 3 (7%) abdominal drainage and 8 (19%) femoral thermodilution catheter; mean BMI was 28.3 kg/m 2 . One (0.3%) major complication was observed, while fourteen (33.3%) patients developed minor complications (pressure injuries). ICU length-of-stay and MV days correlated with both incidence (p = 0.029 and p = 0.015 respectively) and number (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001 respectively) of pressure sores (n = 27). Propensity matching score analysis did not show any protective factor of pronation regarding pressure injuries (p = 0.448). No other significant correlation was found. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary healthcare professional management can reduce most severe complication related to pronation in critical care setting. Rather than from pronation, the persistent high rate of minor complications appeared to be related to disease severity. Highlights: During pandemic, NEMS analysis confirmed a greater nurse workload compared to usual. The ICU Pronation team (IPT) reduced major complications related to pronation. The IPT did not show any protective factor on pressure injuries incidence. Pressure injuries were correlated to disease severity rather than pronation.