Histopathologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. Issue 51 (23rd December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Da Mi; Kim, Gwang Ha; Lee, Bong Eun; Kim, Kyungbin; Choi, Kyung Un; Hong, Seung Min; Lee, Moon Won; Song, Geun Am
• Editors: Kantarçeken., Bülent
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 100:Issue 51(2021)
• Page Start: e28307
• Publication Date: 2021-12-23
• Subjects: endoscopic resection -- histopathologic discrepancy -- nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028307
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract : Abstract: For patients with nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs), endoscopic forceps biopsy results that reflect the final histopathologic results of the entire lesion are indispensable for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment modality selection. This study aimed to investigate the histopathologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in NADETs and to elucidate the factors contributing to such discrepancies. This retrospective observational study included 105 patients (105 lesions) who underwent endoscopic resection for NADETs at the Pusan National University Hospital between May 2006 and October 2019. NADETs were classified as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasms (LGINs), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasms (HGINs), or adenocarcinomas. Following slide reviews, the histopathologic concordance between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens was assessed for each case. The histopathologic discrepancy rate between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens was 19.0% (20/105 lesions). Among the 20 diagnostically discordant lesions, up- and downgrade of the histopathologic diagnosis occurred in 17 and 3 lesions, respectively. The predominant discrepancies involved upgrades from LGIN to HGIN (n = 14) and upgrades from LGIN to adenocarcinomas (n = 2). The 3 downgraded cases included 2 from LGIN to inflammation and 1 from HGIN to LGIN. In the multivariate analyses, the old age (>67 years) was the only factor significantly associated with histopathologic upgrade (odds ratio 4.553, 95% confidence interval 1.291–15.939; P = .018). Considerable histopathologic discrepancies were observed between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in NADETs. Older age was significantly associated with these discrepancies.