As good as it gets: a scaling comparison of DNA computing, network biocomputing, and electronic computing approaches to an NP-complete problem. (6th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sudalaiyadum Perumal, Ayyappasamy; Wang, Zihao; Ippoliti, Giulia; van Delft, Falco C M J M; Kari, Lila; Nicolau, Dan V
• Is Part Of: New journal of physics. Volume 23:Number 12(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-12-06
• Subjects: unconventional computing -- natural computing -- DNA computing -- network biocomputing -- NP-complete problem -- subset sum problem; Physics -- Periodicals; Physics; Periodicals; 530.05
• DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac3883
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1367-2630

Abstract

Abstract: All known algorithms to solve nondeterministic polynomial (NP) complete problems, relevant to many real-life applications, require the exploration of a space of potential solutions, which grows exponentially with the size of the problem. Since electronic computers can implement only limited parallelism, their use for solving NP-complete problems is impractical for very large instances, and consequently alternative massively parallel computing approaches were proposed to address this challenge. We present a scaling analysis of two such alternative computing approaches, DNA computing (DNA-C) and network biocomputing with agents (NB-C), compared with electronic computing (E-C). The Subset Sum Problem (SSP), a known NP-complete problem, was used as a computational benchmark, to compare the volume, the computing time, and the energy required for each type of computation, relative to the input size. Our analysis shows that the sequentiality of E-C translates in a very small volume compared to that required by DNA-C and NB-C, at the cost of the E-C computing time being outperformed first by DNA-C (linear run time), followed by NB-C. Finally, NB-C appears to be more energy-efficient than DNA-C for some types of input sets, while being less energy-efficient for others, with E-C being always an order of magnitude less energy efficient than DNA-C. This scaling study suggest that presently none of these computing approaches win, even theoretically, for all three key performance criteria, and that all require breakthroughs to overcome their limitations, with potential solutions including hybrid computing approaches.