Accounting for GIA signal in GRACE products. Issue 3 (12th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vishwakarma, Bramha Dutt; Horwath, Martin; Groh, Andreas; Bamber, Jonathan L
• Is Part Of: Geophysical journal international. Volume 228:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 2056
• Page End: 2060
• Publication Date: 2021-11-12
• Subjects: Global change from geodesy -- Satellite geodesy -- Time variable gravity; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggab464
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0956-540X

Abstract

SUMMARY: The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observes gravitational potential anomalies that include the effects of present-day surface mass change (PDSMC)- and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA)-driven solid Earth mass redistribution. Therefore, GIA estimates from a forward model are commonly removed from GRACE to estimate PDSMC. There are several GIA models and to facilitate users in using a GIA model of their choice, both GRACE and GIA products are made available in terms of global gridded fields representing mass anomaly. GRACE-observed gravitational potential anomalies are represented in terms of equivalent water height (EWH) with a relation that accounts for an elastic solid Earth deformation due to PDSMC. However, for obtaining GIA EWH fields from GIA gravitational potential fields, two relations are being used: one that is similar to that being used for GRACE EWH and the other that does not include an elastic deformation effect. This leaves users with the possibility of obtaining different values for PDSMC with a given GRACE and GIA field. In this paper, we discuss the impact of this problem on regional mass change estimates and highlight the need for consistent treatment of GIA signals in GRACE observations.