Pediatric deep burn management after split-thickness autologous skin transplantation: A comparative study. Issue 44 (5th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lőrincz, Aba; Lamberti, Anna Gabriella; Juhász, Zsolt; Garami, András; Józsa, Gergő
• Other Names: Mayr. Johannes section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 100:Issue 44(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11-05
• Subjects: deep pediatric burn -- hydrofiber dressing -- silver foam -- skin graft -- Zinc-hyaluronic acid; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027633
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Treatment of pediatric deep burns remains a challenge for healthcare personnel. After skin grafting, several treatment options are available, but comparative studies of the different options are scarce. Here, we compared the effectiveness of 2 postoperative dressings used to treat deep pediatric burns after split-thickness skin grafting. At the Department of Paediatrics, University of Pécs, 16 children received skin transplantation after the deep second and third-degree injuries between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2020 whose results have been analyzed, in this cohort study. We compared the traditionally used Grassolind or Mepitel net and Betadine solution (comparison group) with Aquacel Ag foam and Curiosa gel (intervention group). Seven children were included in the comparison and 9 children in the intervention group. In the control group, the average number of anesthesia was 6.29, while the number of dressing changes was 4.29. After complete wound closure, the dressing's final removal was on the 13th day, while the mean length of hospitalization was 21.89 days. On average, in the intervention group, 3.56 anesthesia was induced, and 0.66 dressing changes were needed after transplantation. Complete healing (dressing removal) was on the 10th day, and the mean length of hospitalization was 12.38 days. In the intervention group, the need for anesthesia significantly decreased by 43% ( P = .004), and they required 84% fewer dressing changes after transplantation ( P = .001). Moreover, the dressing could be removed 3 days earlier, and the length of hospitalization was reduced by 45% on average.