Family outcomes in alternative response: A multilevel analysis of recurrence. (January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shipe, Stacey L.; Uretsky, Mathew C.; Shaw, Terry V.
• Is Part Of: Children and youth services review. Volume 132(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01
• Subjects: Alternative response -- Recurrence -- Multilevel analysis; Social work with children -- Periodicals; Social work with youth -- Periodicals; Adolescent -- Periodicals; Child Welfare -- Periodicals; Social Work -- Periodicals; Service social aux enfants -- Périodiques; Service social à la jeunesse -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 362.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106283
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0190-7409

Abstract

Highlights: Alternative response is a widely used practice in child protective services. Despite use of AR, families continue to return to the child protective system. Family return, or recurrences, are not substantially different for individual families. County level differences of AR require further investigation. Abstract: Alternative response (AR) is preventative, family-centered, strengths-based approach within child protective services (CPS). When AR is offered it typically creates a two-track system where low- to moderate-risk families are not subjected to a traditional, fact-finding response that concludes with a determination of child abuse/neglect. One area that continues to concern child welfare administrators and researchers is recurrence, or when a family returns to CPS. Yet, it is unclear whether AR families have the same or different predictors of recurrence than TR families. Using a multilevel analytic approach, the present study followed 17, 741 families in one mid-Atlantic state for 18-months post-response to determine what child, family, and county-level predicted a reported re-investigation and a substantiated re-investigation. We found few differences in predictors at the child and family level but found distinct differences at the county level for AR families. Recommendations are provided for policy, practice, and research, including a suggestion for further inquiry on what makes an optimal AR track.