Real-world deployment of lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in the emergency department to provide rapid, accurate and safe diagnosis of COVID-19. Issue 4 (December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Real-world deployment of lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in the emergency department to provide rapid, accurate and safe diagnosis of COVID-19. Issue 4 (December 2021)
- Main Title:
- Real-world deployment of lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in the emergency department to provide rapid, accurate and safe diagnosis of COVID-19
- Authors:
- Merrick, B.
Noronha, M.
Batra, R.
Douthwaite, S.
Nebbia, G.
Snell, L.B.
Pickering, S.
Galao, R.P.
Whitfield, J.
Jahangeer, A.
Gunawardena, R.
Godfrey, T.
Laifa, R.
Webber, K.
Cliff, P.R.
Cunningham, E.
Neil, S.J.D.
Gettings, H.
Edgeworth, J.D.
Harrison, H.L. - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Point-of-care (POC) SARS-CoV-2 lateral-flow antigen detection (LFD) testing in the emergency department (ED) could inform rapid infection control decisions but requirements for safe deployment have not been fully defined Methods: Review of LFD test results, laboratory and POC-RT-PCR results and ED-performance metrics during a two-week high SARS-CoV-2 prevalence period followed by several months of falling prevalence. Aim: Determine whether LFD testing can be safely deployed in ED to provide an effective universal SARS-CoV-2 testing capability. Findings: 93% (345/371) of COVID-19 patients left ED with a virological diagnosis during the 2-week universal LFD evaluation period compared to 77% with targeted POC-RT-PCR deployment alone, on background of approximately one-third having an NHS Track and Trace RT-PCR test-result at presentation. LFD sensitivity and specificity was 70.7% and 99.1% respectively providing a PPV of 97.7% and NPV of 86.4% with disease prevalence of 34.7%. ED discharge-delays (breaches) attributable to COVID-19 fell to 33/3532 (0.94%) compared with the preceding POC-RT-PCR period (107/4114 (2.6%); p=<0.0001). Importantly, LFD testing identified 1 or 2 clinically-unsuspected COVID-19 patients/day. Three clinically-confirmed LFD false positive patients were appropriately triaged based on LFD action-card flowchart, and only 5 of 95 false-negative LFD results were inappropriately admitted to non-COVID-19 areas where no onward-transmissionSummary: Background: Point-of-care (POC) SARS-CoV-2 lateral-flow antigen detection (LFD) testing in the emergency department (ED) could inform rapid infection control decisions but requirements for safe deployment have not been fully defined Methods: Review of LFD test results, laboratory and POC-RT-PCR results and ED-performance metrics during a two-week high SARS-CoV-2 prevalence period followed by several months of falling prevalence. Aim: Determine whether LFD testing can be safely deployed in ED to provide an effective universal SARS-CoV-2 testing capability. Findings: 93% (345/371) of COVID-19 patients left ED with a virological diagnosis during the 2-week universal LFD evaluation period compared to 77% with targeted POC-RT-PCR deployment alone, on background of approximately one-third having an NHS Track and Trace RT-PCR test-result at presentation. LFD sensitivity and specificity was 70.7% and 99.1% respectively providing a PPV of 97.7% and NPV of 86.4% with disease prevalence of 34.7%. ED discharge-delays (breaches) attributable to COVID-19 fell to 33/3532 (0.94%) compared with the preceding POC-RT-PCR period (107/4114 (2.6%); p=<0.0001). Importantly, LFD testing identified 1 or 2 clinically-unsuspected COVID-19 patients/day. Three clinically-confirmed LFD false positive patients were appropriately triaged based on LFD action-card flowchart, and only 5 of 95 false-negative LFD results were inappropriately admitted to non-COVID-19 areas where no onward-transmission was identified. LFD testing was restricted to asymptomatic patients when disease prevalence fell below 5% and detected 1–3 cases/week. Conclusion: Universal SARS-CoV-2 LFD testing can be safely and effectively deployed in ED alongside POC-RT-PCR testing during periods of high and low disease prevalence. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Infection Prevention in Practice. Volume 3:Issue 4(2021)
- Journal:
- Infection Prevention in Practice
- Issue:
- Volume 3:Issue 4(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 3, Issue 4 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0003-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12
- Subjects:
- SARS-CoV-2 -- Lateral flow viral antigen detection devices -- LFD -- Emergency department -- Nosocomial transmission
ED Emergency Department -- LFD lateral flow antigen detection
Infection -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Infection Control
Infection -- Prevention
Electronic journals
Periodical
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.9045 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/infection-prevention-in-practice ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100186 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2590-0889
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20280.xml