Treatment of 120 adult osteosarcoma patients with metachronous and synchronous metastases: A retrospective series of the French Sarcoma Group. Issue 4 (5th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lavit, Elise; Aldea, Mihaela; Piperno‐Neumann, Sophie; Firmin, Nelly; Italiano, Antoine; Isambert, Nicolas; Kurtz, Jean‐Emmanuel; Delcambre, Corinne; Lebrun, Valérie; Soibinet‐Oudot, Pauline; Chevreau, Christine; Bompas, Emmanuelle; Le Maignan, Christine; Boudou‐Rouquette, Pascaline; Le Cesne, Axel; Mancini, Julien; Blay, Jean‐Yves; Duffaud, Florence
• Is Part Of: International journal of cancer. Volume 150:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 645
• Page End: 653
• Publication Date: 2021-10-05
• Subjects: metastatic osteosarcomas -- prognosis -- treatment; Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33823
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-7136

Abstract

Abstract: Treatment options for metastatic osteosarcomas are scarce. Following failure of standard first line therapy, patients who relapse present a challenging treatment dilemma, and have a poor prognosis. Surgical removal of all metastases is essential. A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic osteosarcomas was conducted in 15 French Sarcoma Group centers. From January 2009 to December 2018, we identified 120 adult patients; 36 with synchronous and 84 with metachronous metastases with 74 males and 46 females. Mean age was 30 years (18‐53). Metastatic sites were lung, bone and other in 91, 11 and 24 patients, respectively. Mean time to first metachronous metastases was 22 months (4‐97). All patients except 13 (10.8%) with metachronous metastases received a first line systemic treatment for relapse, and 39 patients (32.5%) were included in a clinical trial. Eighty‐one patients (67.5%) had local treatment of distant metastases. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.5 (95% CI 4.6‐6.4) and 20.5 months (95% CI 13.2‐27.7) respectively for the overall group. In multivariate analysis, more than five metastases, time to first metastases <24 months, were statistically significant negative prognostic factors for OS and PFS ( P = .002, ≤.001 and P = .006, ≤.001, respectively). Surgery of metastases was associated with better prognosis on OS and PFS ( P = .001 and .037, respectively). The presence of bone metastases was a negative prognostic factor on OS but not on PFS ( P = .021). In reference sarcoma centers, relapsed osteosarcoma patients with more than one metastasis commonly receive more than one line of systemic therapy, and are included in clinical trial if available. Abstract : What's new? About a third of osteosarcoma patients will develop metastases, usually with a poor prognosis. In this French study of adult osteosarcoma patients, the authors compared different treatment modalities, both systemic and localized. They also sought to define prognostic factors, both for patients who developed metastases after their initial treatment, and also for those with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. They found no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups. They also conclude that radical focal treatment of metastases is the only modality that allows long‐lasting survival.