Characteristics of the aortic root morphology in conotruncal anomaly of the congenital heart disease. Issue 2 (February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ichikawa, Naoko; Shiina, Yumi; Kijima, Yasufumi; Kodama, Hiroyuki; Abe, Kohei; Komiyama, Nobuyuki; Niwa, Koichiro
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiology. Volume 79:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 277
• Page End: 282
• Publication Date: 2022-02
• Subjects: Aortopathy -- Conotruncal anomaly -- Tetralogy of Fallot -- Aortic valve complex -- Valve-sparing aortic root replacement; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.09.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0914-5087

Abstract

Highlight: l Adults with conotruncal anomaly (CA) show dilated aortic root. l Aortic valve leaflets themselves tend to be enlarged. l CA can be a good indication for a valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Abstract: Background: Aortopathy is a well-known feature of conotruncal anomalies, but it remains unknown whether valve-sparing aortic root replacement, such as the David procedure, is feasible in young patients with severe aortic regurgitation. We assessed the aortic valve complex and aortic root morphology in patients with conotruncal anomalies using echocardiography. Furthermore, we evaluated the relevant factors associated with aortopathy in this population. Methods: A total of 172 adult patients with conotruncal anomalies were enrolled in this study. Dimensions of the aortic valve complex were measured at the level of the sinus of Valsalva (SV) and sinotubular junction (STJ). The geometric height (GH), effective height (EH), and coaptation length (CL) were also assessed to analyze the aortic valve complex in detail. Results: Sixteen of 172 patients were excluded due to poor imaging; 105 patients with tetralogy of Fallot, 24 with double outlet right ventricle, and 27 with transposition of the great arteries totaling 156 patients (32+/-11 years old) were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into four groups: Group 1 (98 patients) had no dilatation of SV or STJ; Group 2 (32 patients) had dilated SV and STJ; Group 3 (14 patients) had dilated SV; and Group 4 (12 patients) had dilated STJ. GH and EH in Group 2 were also highest among the four, whereas CL was not significantly shortened. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, age, and conduit repair were risk factors for aortopathy in this population. Conclusions: Patients with dilated SV and STJ (Group 2) were the most common among the patients with aortopathy (Groups 2, 3, and 4). The aortic valve leaflets themselves were enlarged, and the poor coaptation of the valve tips was compensated in spite of aortic root dilatation, which plays an important role in preventing severe aortic regurgitation in this population. Overall, valve-sparing aortic valve replacement is more feasible in the young populations than we expected. Graphical abstract: Image, graphical abstract