Utility and outcomes among Indigenous and non‐Indigenous patients requiring domiciliary oxygen therapy in the regional and rural Australian population. (13th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Heraganahally, Subash S.; Mortimer, Nathan; Howarth, Timothy; Messenger, Raelene; Issac, Siji; Thomas, Izaak; Brannelly, Coralie
• Is Part Of: Australian journal of rural health. Volume 29:Number 6(2021)
• Page Start: 918
• Page End: 926
• Publication Date: 2021-09-13
• Subjects: Aboriginal -- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease -- malignancy -- mortality -- palliative; Rural health -- Periodicals; Rural health -- Australia -- Periodicals; 613
• DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12782
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1038-5282

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the utility and outcomes for Indigenous and non‐Indigenous patients requiring domiciliary oxygen therapy. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Patients residing in the regional and rural Top End Health Service region of the Northern Territory of Australia. Participants: Indigenous and non‐Indigenous patients prescribed domiciliary oxygen therapy between 2018 and 2020. Interventions: Demographics and clinical indication for domiciliary oxygen therapy and mortality were analysed. Main outcome measures: Differences between Indigenous patients requiring domiciliary oxygen therapy in comparison with their non‐Indigenous counterparts. Results: Of the 199 study participants, the majority were male (51%), non‐Indigenous (77%) and urban residents (72%). Overall chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was the most common indication for domiciliary oxygen therapy (51%) followed by palliative intent (22%). Indigenous patients were significantly younger (61 vs 73 years), with a higher proportion of males (62% vs 45%, P = .039) and remote residents (62% vs 8%, P < .001). Among Indigenous patients, a significantly greater proportion of domiciliary oxygen therapy was indicated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis (16% vs 1%, P < .001). Among non‐Indigenous patients, malignancies were a more common indication for domiciliary oxygen therapy. A similar proportion of Indigenous and non‐Indigenous patients were prescribed domiciliary oxygen therapy for palliative intent (31% and 20%, P = .108); however, the underlying diagnosis differed significantly, with a greater proportion of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among Indigenous patients (43% vs 13%, P = .030) and malignancy among the non‐Indigenous patients (73% vs 43%, P = .050). Mortality and length of survival were not significantly different by Indigenous status. Linear regression showed longer survival with domiciliary oxygen therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Conclusion: Indigenous Australian patients living in remote communities will likely derive the same benefits and outcomes of domiciliary oxygen therapy as non‐Indigenous peers.