Exploring Scientists' Values by Analyzing How They Frame Nature and Uncertainty. Issue 11 (18th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vazquez, Marco; McIlroy‐Young, Bronwyn; Steel, Daniel; Giang, Amanda; Öberg, Gunilla
• Is Part Of: Risk analysis. Volume 41:Issue 11(2021)
• Page Start: 2094
• Page End: 2111
• Publication Date: 2021-02-18
• Subjects: Cultural theory of risk -- framing -- uncertainty -- values in science -- wastewater; Technology -- Risk assessment -- Periodicals; 658.403
• DOI: 10.1111/risa.13701
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0272-4332

Abstract

Abstract: Several scholars have proposed that values embedded in science are a central reason why more research does not necessarily resolve scientific controversies around complex environmental issues. In the Capital Regional District, British Columbia, Canada, scientists have positioned themselves for and against the construction of a wastewater treatment plant in a debate framed as purely technical. This study explores the link between the scientists' positions in the debate and the way they, in their scientific publications, portray nature and environmental risks. We performed a qualitative content analysis of peer‐reviewed publications by scientists who have publicly taken opposing positions in the controversy. We found that scientists against treatment predominantly frame nature as tolerant, up to a limit, to disturbances and potential risks, and they seem to embrace a view of science as capable of reducing uncertainties. In contrast, scientists in favor of treatment predominantly portray nature as fragile, particularly toward human‐mobilized environmental risks and they commonly present scientific uncertainty as worrisome based on potentially harmful consequences. Our study suggests that value‐laden perspectives impact scientists' positions even in a seemingly technical controversy.