A novel CRT‐IMRT‐combined (Co‐CRIM) planning technique for peripheral lung stereotactic body radiotherapy in pinnacle treatment planning system. Issue 12 (26th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Duan, YanHua; Zhou, LiJun; Wang, Hao; Chen, Hua; Gu, HengLe; Shao, Yan; Feng, AiHui; Huang, Ying; Fu, XiaoLong; Yue, Ning Jeff; Ma, Kui; Kong, Qing; Xu, ZhiYong
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 22:Issue 12(2021)
• Page Start: 97
• Page End: 107
• Publication Date: 2021-10-26
• Subjects: Co‐CRIM -- CRT -- IMRT -- lung SBRT -- planning strategy -- VMAT; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13461
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: This study attempts to explore a novel peripheral lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning technique that can balance the pros and cons of three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (CRT) and intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) / volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: Treatment plans were retrospectively designed based on CRT, IMRT, VMAT, and the proposed CRT‐IMRT‐combined (Co‐CRIM) techniques using Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) for 20 peripheral lung cancer patients. Co‐CRIM used an inverse optimization algorithm available in Pinnacle TPS. To develop a Co‐CRIM plan, the number of segments in each field was limited to one, the minimum segment area was set to the internal target volume (ITV), and the minimum monitor units (MU) of the segment was the quotient of fractional dose divided by twice the number of total fields. The performance of Co‐CRIM was then compared with other techniques. Results: For conformity index (CI), Co‐CRIM performed comparably to IMRT/VMAT but better than CRT. For gradient index (GI), Co‐CRIM was similar to IMRT/VMAT or CRT. For heterogeneity index (HI), Co‐CRIM was comparable to IMRT/VMAT, higher than CRT. The dosimetric results of spinal cord and lung with Co‐CRIM were better than CRT, comparable to IMRT, but inferior to VMAT. The MU resulted from Co‐CRIM was lower than IMRT/VMAT but higher than CRT. For plan verification γ passing rate, Co‐CRIM was higher than IMRT/VMAT, comparable to CRT. For planning time, Co‐CRIM was shorter than CRT or VMAT but similar to IMRT. Conclusions: The proposed Co‐CRIM technique on Pinnacle TPS is an effective planning technique for peripheral lung SBRT.