Importance of public‐private partnerships for nutrition support research: An ASPEN Position Paper. Issue 8 (20th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mueller, Charles; Jonnalagadda, Satya; Torres, Krysmaru Araujo; Blackmer, Allison; Cetnarowski, Wes; Chen, Yimin; Citty, Sandra Wolfe; Dye, Elizabeth; Hubbard, Van S.; Kumbhat, Seema; Ottery, Faith; Russell, Mary E.; Sacks, Gordon S; Turner, Justine
• Is Part Of: JPEN, Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. Volume 45:Issue 8(2021)
• Page Start: 1619
• Page End: 1626
• Publication Date: 2021-10-20
• Subjects: conflict of interest -- industry -- nutrition support practice -- public‐private partnership -- research funding -- research -- transparency; Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals; Enteral feeding -- Periodicals; 615.85484
• DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2239
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-6071

Abstract

Abstract: Parenteral and enteral nutrition support are key components of care for various medical and physiological conditions in infants, children, and adults. Nutrition support practices have advanced over time, driven by the goals of safe and sufficient delivery of needed nutrients and improved patient outcomes. These advances have been, and continue to be, dependent on research and development studies. Such studies address aspects of enteral and parenteral nutrition support: formulations, delivery devices, health outcomes, cost‐effectiveness, and related metabolism. The studies are supported by public funding from the government and by private funding from foundations and from the nutrition support industry. To build public trust in nutrition support research findings, it is important to underscore ethical research conduct and reporting of results for all studies, including those with industry sponsors. In 2019, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition's (ASPEN's) Board of Directors established a task force to ensure integrity in nutrition support research that is done as collaborative partnerships between the public (government and individuals) and private groups (foundations, academia, and industry). In this ASPEN Position Paper, the Task Force presents principles of ethical research to guide administrators, researchers, and funders. The Task Force identifies ways to curtail bias and to minimize actual or perceived conflict of interests, as related to funding sources and research conduct. Notably, this paper includes a Position Statement to describe the Task Force's guidance on Public‐Private Partnerships for research and funding. This paper has been approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors.