Qualitative Content Analysis of Coworkers' Safety Reports of Unprofessional Behavior by Physicians and Advanced Practice Professionals. Issue 8 (16th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martinez, William; Pichert, James W.; Hickson, Gerald B.; Braddy, Casey H.; Brown, Amy J.; Catron, Thomas F.; Moore, Ilene N.; Stampfle, Morgan R.; Webb, Lynn E.; Cooper, William O.
• Is Part Of: Journal of patient safety. Volume 17:Issue 8(2021)
• Page Start: e883
• Page End: e889
• Publication Date: 2021-12-16
• Subjects: patient safety -- safety culture -- qualitative research -- incident reporting -- professionalism; Patients -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Practice -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 610.289
• DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000481
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1549-8417

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text. Abstract : Objectives: The aims of the study were to develop a valid and reliable taxonomy of coworker reports of alleged unprofessional behavior by physicians and advanced practice professionals and determine the prevalence of reports describing particular types of unprofessional conduct. Methods: We conducted qualitative content analysis of coworker reports of alleged unprofessional behavior by physicians and advanced practice professionals to create a standardized taxonomy. We conducted a focus group of experts in medical professionalism to assess the taxonomy's face validity. We randomly selected 120 reports (20%) of the 590 total reports submitted through the medical center's safety event reporting system between June 2015 and September 2016 to measure interrater reliability of taxonomy codes and estimate the prevalence of reports describing particular types of conduct. Results: The initial taxonomy contained 22 codes organized into the following four domains: competent medical care, clear and respectful communication, integrity, and responsibility. All 10 experts agreed that the four domains reflected essential elements of medical professionalism. Interrater reliabilities for all codes and domains had a κ value greater than the 0.60 threshold for good reliability. Most reports (60%, 95% confidence interval = 51%–69%) described disrespectful or offensive communication. Nine codes had a prevalence of less than 1% and were folded into their respective domains resulting in a final taxonomy composed of 13 codes. Conclusions: The final taxonomy represents a useful tool with demonstrated validity and reliability, opening the door for reliable analysis and systems to promote accountability and behavior change. Given the safety implications of unprofessional behavior, understanding the typology of coworker observations of unprofessional behavior may inform organization strategies to address this threat to patient safety.