Edge-localized-mode simulation in CFETR steady-state scenario. (2nd December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tang, T.F.; Xu, X.Q.; Li, G.Q.; Chen, J.L.; Chan, V.S.; Xia, T.Y.; Gao, X.; Wang, D.Z.; Li, J.G.
• Is Part Of: Nuclear fusion. Volume 62:Number 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2021-12-02
• Subjects: grassy ELM -- ELM simulation -- heat flux width -- BOUT++ -- transient heat flux; Nuclear fusion -- Periodicals; 621.48405
• DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac3294
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0029-5515

Abstract

Abstract: The EPED1 model and self-consistent core-pedestal coupling in integrated modeling are used to design the pedestal structure of the China Fusion Engineering Testing Reactor (CFETR) steady-state scenario. The key parameters, such as β p and q 95, are based on the grassy edge-localized-mode (ELM) experimental database. In this work, we use the BOUT++ six-field two-fluid code to simulate the onset of the ELM in the CFETR steady-state scenario. The ELM size is around 0.2% in nonlinear simulations, which is in the experimental range of the grassy ELM discharges, 0.1%–1% observed in multiple tokamak devices. Linear and nonlinear simulations show that the dominant high- n ballooning modes peak around n = 40. Compared to type-I ELM crashing dynamics, grassy ELM crashing has a smaller initial crash and is then followed by three phases of turbulence spreading, which are dominated by multi-modes, a high- n mode of n = 45 and low- n mode of n = 5, respectively. In contras to type-I ELM, the perturbation of the high- n mode has a narrow width around ψ = 0.95, and magnetic island formation and reconnection occur only beyond ψ = 0.95, leading to a small initial crash. Mode–mode interaction in the multi-mode coexistence stage stops the growth of individual modes and reduces the transport of particles and heat, and these are the two reasons why the ELM size is small. In–out asymmetry of transient heat flux with a ratio of E out / E in = 3.5 is found during grassy ELM crash. The rise and delay times of the heat flux match the calculation from the free-streaming model. To evaluate the erosion of the divertor target, the energy fluence at the outer divertor target is calculated, which is 0.029 MJ m −2, 5.5 times smaller than the tungsten melting limit 0.16 MJ m −2 . The calculated energy fluency still follows the experimental scaling law from type-I ELM experiments. The fluctuation eddies in the toroidal direction show a filament structure at the outer mid-plane. Parallel heat flux patterns with a toroidal mode number n = 10 are found at the outer divertor with an amplitude of 680 MW m −2 .