CTNI-50. REGORAFENIB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS: A LARGE REAL-LIFE EXPERIENCE. (12th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Caccese, Mario; Cerretti, Giulia; Padovan, Marta; Zagonel, Vittorina; Lombardi, Giuseppe
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 23: Supplement 6(2021)
• Page Start: vi71
• Page End: vi71
• Publication Date: 2021-11-12
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.275
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Regorafenib (REG), an oral multikinase inhibitor, showed benefit in recurrent GBM (recGBM) patients in the REGOMA trial. We investigated the clinical outcome and safety of REG in a real-life population of recGBM patients treated at Veneto Institute of Oncology as off-label use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients receiving REG were entered prospectively on a clinical database. Data were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. The major inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed diagnosis of GBM, disease progression by RANO criteria after Stupp protocol, ECOG PS ≤ 2. Patients received REG 160 mg per day for the first 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival, RANO criteria for radiological assessment, CTCAE v5.0 for drug related adverse events. RESULTS: 54 patients were enrolled: median age was 56, ECOG PS 0-1 in 91%, MGMTmet in 53%, second surgery at the time of relapse in 30%. Median follow-up was 11.1ms, 30 PTS (56%) had died and 50 PTS (93%) had progressed. MedianOS was 10.2 ms (95%CI, 6.4-13.9), 12m-OS was 43%; medianPFS was 2.3 ms (95%CI, 1.3-3.3) and 6m-PFS was 18%. Disease control rate (DCR) was 46.3%; stable disease was reported in 38.8% and partial response in 7.4%. Age, MGMT and corticosteroid use at baseline were not statistically significant on multivariate analysis for OS. Grade 3 drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 10 patients (18%) and the most frequent were hand-foot skin reaction, asthenia and increased lipase and transaminases; 1 PT(2%) reported a grade 4 AE (rash maculo-papular). AEs led to REG dose reductions in 37% of patients and, it was permanently discontinued in 5%. CONCLUSIONS: We reported a "real-world" experience of REG in recGBM patients. Results are close to those reported in REGOMA trial; we showed a longer OS. Toxicity was manageable. Encouraging clinical benefits of REG in recGBM population were confirmed.