NIMG-26. IMPROVING THE GENERALIZABILITY OF DEEP LEARNING FOR T2-LESION SEGMENTATION OF GLIOMAS IN THE POST-TREATMENT SETTING. (12th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ellison, Jacob; Caliva, Francesco; Damasceno, Pablo; Luks, Tracy; LaFontaine, Marisa; Li, Yan; Pedoia, Valentina; Villanueva-Meyer, Javier; Lupo, Janine
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 23: Supplement 6(2021)
• Page Start: vi134
• Page End: vi134
• Publication Date: 2021-11-12
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.526
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: Although current advances for automated glioma lesion segmentation and volumetric measurements using deep learning have yielded high performance on newly-diagnosed patients, response assessment in neuro-oncology still relies on manually-drawn, cross-sectional areas of the tumor because these models do not generalize to patients in the post-treatment setting, where they are most needed in the clinic. Surgical resections, adjuvant treatment, or disease progression can alter the characteristics of these lesions on T2-weighted imaging, causing measures of segmentation accuracy, typically measured by Dice coefficients of overlap (DCs), to drop by ~15%. To improve the generalizability of T2-lesion segmentation to patients with glioma post-treatment, we evaluated the effects of: 1) training with different proportions of newly-diagnosed and treated gliomas, 2) applying transfer learning from pre- to post-treatment domains, and 3) incorporating a loss term that spatially weights the lesion boundaries with greater emphasis in training. Using 425 patients (208 newly-diagnosed, 217 post-Tx, with 25 treated patients withheld as a test set) and a top-performing model previously trained on newly-diagnosed gliomas, we found that DCs increased by 10% (to 0.84) then plateaued after including ~25% of post-treatment patients in training. Transfer learning (pre-training on newly-diagnosed and finetuning with post-treatment data) significantly improved Hausdorf distances (HDs), a measure more sensitive to changes at the lesion boundaries, by 17% after including 26% post-treatment images in training, while DCs remained similar. Although modifying our loss functions with boundary-weighted penalizations resulted in comparable DCs to using standard DC loss, HD measures were further reduced by 26%, suggesting that HDs may be a more sensitive metric to subtle changes in segmentation accuracy than DCs. Current work is evaluating their utility in providing accurate volumes for real-time response assessment in the clinic using workflows that have recently been deployed on our clinical PACs system.