NCOG-44. FEASIBILITY AND UTILITY OF THE MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT IN ROUTINE CLINICAL EXAMS AND TELEHEALTH VISITS IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY. (12th November 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- NCOG-44. FEASIBILITY AND UTILITY OF THE MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT IN ROUTINE CLINICAL EXAMS AND TELEHEALTH VISITS IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY. (12th November 2021)
- Main Title:
- NCOG-44. FEASIBILITY AND UTILITY OF THE MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT IN ROUTINE CLINICAL EXAMS AND TELEHEALTH VISITS IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY
- Authors:
- Jammula, Varna
Vera, Elizabeth
Rogers, James
Christ, Alexa
Leeper, Heather
Acquaye, Alvina
Briceno, Nicole
Choi, Anna
Grajkowska, Ewa
Levine, Jason
Lindsley, Matthew
Reyes, Jennifer
Roche, Kayla
Timmer, Michael
Boris, Lisa
Burton, Eric
Lollo, Nicole
Panzer, Marissa
Smith-Cohn, Matthew
Penas-Prado, Marta
Pillai, Valentina
Theeler, Brett
Wu, Jing
Gilbert, Mark
Armstrong, Terri - Abstract:
- Abstract: Cognitive dysfunction (CD) is common among primary brain tumor (PBT) patients and adds to the overall symptom burden. Standardized assessments able to be incorporated into routine clinical in-person and telehealth care are needed. Here, we report the feasibility, utility, and satisfaction with use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in telehealth and clinical settings by trained clinical providers. Feasibility and provider satisfaction were assessed through survey responses, and patient performance on the MoCA, after a reliability check, was reported through descriptive statistics. Seventy-nine MoCAs on 71 patients were completed in clinic (n=55) or telehealth (n=24). Majority of patients were white (83%) males (54%) with high grade PBTs (66%), and half of patients had completed at least a college education. In clinic, providers (n=9) reported the MoCA took 5-20 minutes to complete, was easy to incorporate into routine practice (78%), believed it was accurate in assessing cognition (67%), and was useful in determining treatment (88%). The average in-person MoCA score was 25 (range: 6 to 30), with 31% of scores classified as abnormal (≤26). In telehealth, providers (n=11) found the administration of the MoCA prior to attending participation in the telehealth visit helpful (75%), discussed the results with their clinical team (75%) and patient (63%), and believed the MoCA was accurate in assessing cognition remotely (63%). On average, patients took 13 minutesAbstract: Cognitive dysfunction (CD) is common among primary brain tumor (PBT) patients and adds to the overall symptom burden. Standardized assessments able to be incorporated into routine clinical in-person and telehealth care are needed. Here, we report the feasibility, utility, and satisfaction with use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in telehealth and clinical settings by trained clinical providers. Feasibility and provider satisfaction were assessed through survey responses, and patient performance on the MoCA, after a reliability check, was reported through descriptive statistics. Seventy-nine MoCAs on 71 patients were completed in clinic (n=55) or telehealth (n=24). Majority of patients were white (83%) males (54%) with high grade PBTs (66%), and half of patients had completed at least a college education. In clinic, providers (n=9) reported the MoCA took 5-20 minutes to complete, was easy to incorporate into routine practice (78%), believed it was accurate in assessing cognition (67%), and was useful in determining treatment (88%). The average in-person MoCA score was 25 (range: 6 to 30), with 31% of scores classified as abnormal (≤26). In telehealth, providers (n=11) found the administration of the MoCA prior to attending participation in the telehealth visit helpful (75%), discussed the results with their clinical team (75%) and patient (63%), and believed the MoCA was accurate in assessing cognition remotely (63%). On average, patients took 13 minutes (9-22) to complete testing, with three tests discordant on reliability scoring and one patient unable to complete testing. The average telehealth MoCA score was 26 (12-30), with 29% of scores classified as abnormal. Overall, testing was feasible in both clinical and telehealth settings, and providers reported satisfaction with its use. Future studies should evaluate validity in a larger sample and include analysis of relevant cut-off scores, impact of disease, tumor treatment, and genomic predispositions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuro-oncology. Volume 23: Supplement 6(2021)
- Journal:
- Neuro-oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 23: Supplement 6(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 23, Issue 6 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 23
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0023-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- vi161
- Page End:
- vi162
- Publication Date:
- 2021-11-12
- Subjects:
- Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals
Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99481 - Journal URLs:
- http://neuro-oncology.dukejournals.org/ ↗
http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/content?genre=journal&issn=1522-8517 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.634 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-8517
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.288000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20208.xml