New risk stratification after colorectal polypectomy reduces burden of surveillance without increasing mortality. Issue 8 (3rd August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Waldmann, Elisabeth; Kammerlander, Andreas; Gessl, Irina; Penz, Daniela; Majcher, Barbara; Hinterberger, Anna; Trauner, Michael; Ferlitsch, Monika
• Is Part Of: United European Gastroenterology journal. Volume 9:Issue 8(2021)
• Page Start: 947
• Page End: 954
• Publication Date: 2021-08-03
• Subjects: cancer -- colonoscopy -- colorectal cancer -- CRC -- mortality -- polypectomy -- risk‐stratification -- screening -- surveillance; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12119
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2050-6406

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The 2020 postpolypectomy surveillance guideline update of European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy defines a more restrictive group of individuals in need for surveillance 3 years after colonoscopy. Aim: The aim of this cohort study was to validate the new guideline recommendation. Methods: Based on a national quality assurance program, we compared the 2020 risk group definition with the previous 2013 recommendations for their strength of association with (1) colorectal cancer death, and (2) all‐cause death. Results: A total of 265, 608 screening colonoscopies were included in the study. Mean age was 61.1 years ( SD ±9.0), and 50.6% were women. During a mean follow‐up of 59.3 months ( SD ±35.0), 170 CRC deaths and 7723 deaths of any cause were identified. 62.4% of colonoscopies were negative and 4.9% were assigned to surveillance after 3 years according to the 2020 guidelines versus 10.4% following the 2013 guidelines, which corresponds to a relative reduction in colonoscopies by 47%. The strength of association with CRC mortality was markedly higher with the 2020 surveillance group as compared to the 2013 guidelines (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.62–4.03 vs. HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.13–2.62), while the magnitude of association with CRC mortality for low risk individuals was lower (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.83–1.63 vs. 1.25, 95% CI 0.88–1.76). Conclusions: Adherence to the updated guidelines reduces the burden of surveillance colonoscopies by 47% while preserving the efficacy of surveillance in preventing CRC mortality. Key summary: Summarize the established knowledge on this subject Individuals who had colorectal polyps removed are advised to undergo surveillance; intervals are based on the number, size, and histopathological features of the resected lesions. In 2020, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) updated their postpolypectomy surveillance guideline. What are the significant and/or new findings of this study? The risk stratification introduced in the new guideline leads to a substantial reduction (by 47%) in the number of individuals in need for surveillance while preserving the efficacy of surveillance in preventing colorectal cancer mortality.