Invasive experimental brain surgery for dementia: Ethical shifts in clinical research practices?. (21st October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gilbert, Frederic; Viaña, John Noel M.; Bittlinger, Merlin; Stevens, Ian; Farrow, Maree; Vickers, James; Dodds, Susan; Illes, Judy
• Is Part Of: Bioethics. Volume 36:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 25
• Page End: 41
• Publication Date: 2021-10-21
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- deep brain stimulation -- dementia -- ethics -- experimental trial -- gene therapy -- informed consent -- invasive brain surgery -- stem cell implantation; Bioethics -- Periodicals; 174.957
• DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12961
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9702

Abstract

Abstract: The increasing dementia prevalence worldwide is driving the testing of novel therapeutic approaches, such as invasive brain technologies, despite limited clinical evidence and the risk of accelerating cognitive decline. Our manuscript (a) reviews the NIH Clinicaltrials.gov database for deep brain stimulation, stem cell implantation, and gene therapy trials on people with dementia; (b) discusses issues on beneficence, nonmaleficence, and autonomy associated with these trials; and (c) proposes nine recommendations that build on elements from the Declaration of Helsinki. We found 49 preregistered high‐risk trials from nine countries planning to or involving 11, 801 people with Alzheimer's or Lewy body dementia or dementia secondary to Parkinson's or Huntington's disease. Most of the people with Alzheimer's who are in these trials are from North America and East Asia. There is substantial heterogeneity in the enrolment criteria, even for trials recruiting only those with Alzheimer's disease. Although most trials enrol people in mild to moderate stages of Alzheimer's disease, trials in China enrol people who have severe Alzheimer's. Our findings highlight a pressing need to review and refine the enrolment criteria for invasive neural trials in people with dementia, considering risks, potential benefits, and capacity for informed consent. As a multidisciplinary team from Australia, the USA, Canada, and Germany with expertise in neurology, neuroscience, and ethics, we examine how it is essential to balance the risks of invasive neural research in a vulnerable population with limited capacity to provide informed consent to help advance the body of knowledge regarding a disease with limited therapeutic options.