A comparative experimental study of two multi-robot olfaction methods: Towards locating time-varying indoor pollutant sources. (January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jiang, Mingrui; Liao, Yu; Guo, Xun; Cai, Hao; Jiang, Wenqing; Yang, Zhou; Li, Fei; Liu, Fei
• Is Part Of: Building and environment. Volume 207:Part B(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01
• Subjects: Indoor environment -- Time-varying source -- Mobile robot olfaction -- Source localization -- Experimental validation; Buildings -- Environmental engineering -- Periodicals; Building -- Research -- Periodicals; Constructions -- Technique de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 696
• DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108560
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-1323

Abstract

Abstract: Locating the source of indoor pollutants/hazardous substances is essential to ensure the health and safety of indoor personnel. The existing studies on source localization using robots rarely focus on time-varying sources whose release rate changes with time. However, in practical applications, time-varying sources are ubiquitous, and it is usually more difficult to locate a time-varying source than a constant source with a constant release rate. This study aims to locate time-varying sources in a real-world indoor environment by using our two newly proposed two multi-robot olfaction methods, namely, the improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO) method and the improved whale swarm algorithm (IWOA) method. To this end, we developed a source localization system composed of three robots and compiled the IPSO and IWOA methods into executable programs. This study conducted 160 experiments for four scenarios, which included two time-varying source types (periodic source and decaying source) and two source locations. In each scenario, 20 independent experiments were conducted for each method. For all four scenarios, the mean success rates of the IPSO and IWOA methods were 80% and 91%, respectively, indicating that both methods have the potential to locate indoor time-varying sources. In terms of the success rate, locating efficiency and locating accuracy, the overall performance of the IWOA method was better than that of the IPSO method. The advantages of the IWOA method were its success rate and locating accuracy, while the disadvantage was its locating efficiency. Highlights: Two multi-robot olfaction methods were experimentally validated and compared. Totally 160 experiments were conducted to locate periodic and decaying sources. Both the two methods have the potential to locate indoor time-varying sources. The IWOA method generally outperformed the IPSO method.