Economic-effectiveness analysis of micro-fins helically coiled tube heat exchanger and optimization based on multi-objective differential evolution algorithm. (25th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yuan, Yuyang; Cao, Jiaming; Wang, Xuesheng; Zhang, Zhao; Liu, Yanbin
• Is Part Of: Applied thermal engineering. Volume 201:Part B(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01-25
• Subjects: Helically coiled tube heat exchanger -- Multi-objective optimization -- Economic analysis -- Effectiveness -- Differential evolution algorithm -- Heat transfer; Heat engineering -- Periodicals; Heating -- Equipment and supplies -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 621.40205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117764
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-4311

Abstract

Highlights: Proposed a new type of micro-fins helically coiled tube. Established the calculation models of helically coiled tube heat exchangers. Analyzed the economic-effectiveness models of the heat exchangers. An adaptive multi-objective differential evolution algorithm is implemented. Abstract: In this study, the heat transfer characteristics and hydrodynamics of a new type of micro-fin helically coiled tube (MF-HCT) are modelled and compared with those of typical smooth helically coiled tubes (HCTs). Calculation models are developed and compared for both helically coiled tube heat exchangers (HCTHEXs) and micro-fin helically coiled tube heat exchangers (MF-HCTHEXs). The total cost and effectiveness are selected as the objective functions, and five independent structural parameters are selected for each type of HCTHEX. Subsequently, an adaptive multi-objective optimization differential evolution algorithm is implemented for both of them, and the results are compared. The results indicate that, for Reynolds numbers smaller than 22, 000, the MF-HCT performs better than the HCT, and the total cost of the MF-HCTHEX is lower than that of the HCTHEX under the same effectiveness. The difference between their total cost increases with their effectiveness and can be up to 79, 000 €. For both the HCTHEX and MF-HCTHEX, when the effectiveness is less than 0.9, it is more appropriate to select a larger winding angle, layer spacing, and tube spacing.