FRI0303 Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2, randomised placebo-controlled study. (12th June 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- FRI0303 Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2, randomised placebo-controlled study. (12th June 2018)
- Main Title:
- FRI0303 Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2, randomised placebo-controlled study
- Authors:
- van Vollenhoven, R.
Hahn, B.H.
Tsokos, G.C.
Wagner, C.
Lipsky, P.
Hsu, B.
Chevrier, M.
Gordon, R.
Triebel, M.
Rose, S. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: IL12 and IL23 have been linked to SLE pathogenesis. Objectives: The anti-IL12/23 monoclonal antibody ustekinumab (UST) was evaluated in pts with active SLE. Methods: We conducted a Ph2, PBO-controlled study in 102 pts with active SLE. Pts were randomised(3:2) to UST IV~6 mg/kg or PBO at wk0, followed by UST SC 90 mg or PBO injections q8w, both added to standard care. Primary endpoint was proportion of pts achieving SLE responder index(SRI)−4 response at wk24. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline(BL) in SLEDAI-2K, PGA and BICLA response. Additional pre-specified endpoint analyses included no BILAG worsening(defined as no new BILAG A and ≤1 new BILAG B) and BILAG flare(≥1 new BILAG A or ≥2 new BILAG B). Results: SRI-4 response occurred in 60% UST vs 31% PBO pts(p=0.005) at wk24 (table 1). UST pts had greater median change from BL in SLEDAI-2K and PGA vs PBO. No difference was observed in BICLA response at wk24; however, in the UST group vs PBO, more pts had no BILAG worsening, and the risk of a new BILAG flare was significantly lower(HR 0.11 [95% CI 0.01–0.94];p=0.0078). UST demonstrated improvement in musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous disease features vs PBO (table 1). Through wk24, 78% UST vs 67% PBO pts had ≥1 AE; 8.3%–9.5%, respectively, had ≥1 SAE; there were no deaths. The overall safety profile was comparable between UST and PBO. Conclusions: UST treatment showed efficacy in pts with active SLE and was well-tolerated. UST may work via aAbstract : Background: IL12 and IL23 have been linked to SLE pathogenesis. Objectives: The anti-IL12/23 monoclonal antibody ustekinumab (UST) was evaluated in pts with active SLE. Methods: We conducted a Ph2, PBO-controlled study in 102 pts with active SLE. Pts were randomised(3:2) to UST IV~6 mg/kg or PBO at wk0, followed by UST SC 90 mg or PBO injections q8w, both added to standard care. Primary endpoint was proportion of pts achieving SLE responder index(SRI)−4 response at wk24. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline(BL) in SLEDAI-2K, PGA and BICLA response. Additional pre-specified endpoint analyses included no BILAG worsening(defined as no new BILAG A and ≤1 new BILAG B) and BILAG flare(≥1 new BILAG A or ≥2 new BILAG B). Results: SRI-4 response occurred in 60% UST vs 31% PBO pts(p=0.005) at wk24 (table 1). UST pts had greater median change from BL in SLEDAI-2K and PGA vs PBO. No difference was observed in BICLA response at wk24; however, in the UST group vs PBO, more pts had no BILAG worsening, and the risk of a new BILAG flare was significantly lower(HR 0.11 [95% CI 0.01–0.94];p=0.0078). UST demonstrated improvement in musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous disease features vs PBO (table 1). Through wk24, 78% UST vs 67% PBO pts had ≥1 AE; 8.3%–9.5%, respectively, had ≥1 SAE; there were no deaths. The overall safety profile was comparable between UST and PBO. Conclusions: UST treatment showed efficacy in pts with active SLE and was well-tolerated. UST may work via a novel mechanism of action in SLE. Disclosure of Interest: R. van Vollenhoven Grant/research support from: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, B. Hahn Grant/research support from: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, G. Tsokos Grant/research support from: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, C. Wagner Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, P. Lipsky Grant/research support from: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, B. Hsu Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, M. Chevrier Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, R. Gordon Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, M. Triebel Employee of: Janssen Biologics, S. Rose Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 77(2018)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 77(2018)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 77, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 77
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0077-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 689
- Page End:
- 689
- Publication Date:
- 2018-06-12
- Subjects:
- Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ard.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=149&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/server3/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&D=ovft&PAGE=titles&SEARCH=annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases.tj&NEWS=N ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.1734 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4967
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20162.xml